Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

I sent a new vote thread for RC2, so this vote is cancelled. Please validate and vote on the new candidate. Thanks! The new candidate fixes the problems that Jacques and John found. On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:29 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Here's a PR that fixes the license issue that Jacques found: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Here's a PR that fixes the license issue that Jacques found: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/548 Once that and the fix for Kryo serialization are reviewed, I'll start another RC. On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:14 PM John Zhuge wrote: > Ryan fixed the kryo serialization issue in > ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Ryan fixed the kryo serialization issue in https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/546. On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 9:35 AM John Zhuge wrote: > - Passed all 7 steps > - Build source code at tag apache-iceberg-0.7.0-incubating-rc1 locally, > unit tests passed. However, my downstream Spark 2.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Ran all steps successfully. +1 Thanks, Romin On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:37 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > Thanks for looking at the licensing! > > All of the non-shaded convenience binaries include a copy of the LICENSE > and NOTICE files from the source distribution. There is only one Jar that > conta

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Thanks for looking at the licensing! All of the non-shaded convenience binaries include a copy of the LICENSE and NOTICE files from the source distribution. There is only one Jar that contains shaded dependencies, iceberg-spark-runtime, and we have separate LICENSE and NOTICE files that get includ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Ran steps, did some greps and random discovery to see if I saw any issues. Couple questions: - Can someone remind me the rules around noting license of dependencies for a binary release. It seems like a binary release is being proposed here via maven but we don't have any LICENSE/NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

BTW, the failure was: Job aborted due to stage failure: Exception while getting task result: com.esotericsoftware.kryo.KryoException: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException Serialization trace: splitOffsets (org.apache.iceberg.GenericDataFile) files (com.netflix.iceberg.spark.source.Writer$TaskCo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

- Passed all 7 steps - Build source code at tag apache-iceberg-0.7.0-incubating-rc1 locally, unit tests passed. However, my downstream Spark 2.3 branch failed integration tests, possibly due to https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/issues/446. I will try Anton's suggestion and report back. O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Mojica | Sr Software Engineer | Adobe From: Ted Gooch Reply-To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" Date: Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 4:39 PM To: Ryan Blue Cc: Anton Okolnychyi , Iceberg Dev List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1 Ran all steps no issues from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Ran all steps successfully. +1 from me. On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 7:30 AM 俊杰陈 wrote: > Ran all steps successfully, +1 > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 7:39 AM Ted Gooch > wrote: > > > > Ran all steps no issues from me. > > +1 > > > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:09 PM Ryan Blue > wrote: > >> > >> +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Ran all steps successfully, +1 On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 7:39 AM Ted Gooch wrote: > > Ran all steps no issues from me. > +1 > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:09 PM Ryan Blue wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> I went through all of the validation and it looks good. >> >> I also tested the iceberg-spark-r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Ran all steps no issues from me. +1 On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:09 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I went through all of the validation and it looks good. > > I also tested the iceberg-spark-runtime Jar with the Apache Spark 2.4.4 > download. Copying the runtime Jar into Spark's jars folde

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

+1 (binding) I went through all of the validation and it looks good. I also tested the iceberg-spark-runtime Jar with the Apache Spark 2.4.4 download. Copying the runtime Jar into Spark's jars folder works without problems to read and write both path-based tables and Hive tables. Metadata tables

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

+1 from me then > On 13 Oct 2019, at 18:33, Ryan Blue wrote: > > The publish steps will now sign all of the artifacts, which is required for > an Apache release. That's why the publish steps fail in master. To fix this > in master, we can come up with a way to only turn on release signatures i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

The publish steps will now sign all of the artifacts, which is required for an Apache release. That's why the publish steps fail in master. To fix this in master, we can come up with a way to only turn on release signatures if `-Prelease` is set, which is how we also select the Apache releases repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Verified signature/checksum/rat, run tests. No other pending questions except what Arina and Gautam brought up. - Anton > On 13 Oct 2019, at 09:17, Gautam wrote: > > I was able to run steps in Ryan's mail just fine but ran into the same thing > Arina mentioned .. when running " ./graldew bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

I was able to run steps in Ryan's mail just fine but ran into the same thing Arina mentioned .. when running "* ./graldew build publish *" .. A problem was found with the configuration of task ':iceberg-api:signApachePublication'. > No value has been specified for property 'signatory.keyId'.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

+1 On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 9:11 PM RD wrote: > Successfully executed steps 1 - 7. > > +1 Release this as Apache Parquet 0.7.0-incubating > > -R > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 8:00 AM Arina Yelchiyeva < > arina.yelchiy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Not sure, if this is related to the release vote but af

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Successfully executed steps 1 - 7. +1 Release this as Apache Parquet 0.7.0-incubating -R On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 8:00 AM Arina Yelchiyeva wrote: > Not sure, if this is related to the release vote but after "Update build > for Apache releases" commit [1], we are not longer able to build Iceberg

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Not sure, if this is related to the release vote but after "Update build for Apache releases" commit [1], we are not longer able to build Iceberg using JitPack. Error [2]: * What went wrong: A problem was found with the configuration of task ':iceberg-api:signApachePublication'. > No value has b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

I’m away for a long weekend without my laptop and will be able to try it out on Tuesday (if votes are still needed). Happy validation everyone! Julien > On Oct 11, 2019, at 18:21, Ryan Blue wrote: > > Here are the steps I included on the last thread if you'd like to validate > the release: > D

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Here are the steps I included on the last thread if you'd like to validate the release: 1. Download the source tarball , signature

[VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC1

Hi everyone, I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating release. The commit id is 028a8d0e65d9c713b9b040c592fa10641b6c867b * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-0.7.0-incubating-rc1 * https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/tree/apache-iceber