Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Thanks JB for fixing the license and notice versions. I think we should have an ASF level project for gradle and maven plugin that can help all apache projects to handle the notice and versions easily. And a huge +1 to Ryan's suggestion

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Hi I guess we have to check the impact of https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30065 and update if needed. I will check there. Regards JB Le lun. 17 mars 2025 à 11:59, Ajantha Bhat a écrit : > Hey everyone, > > Following the plan from the 1.8.0 release, I'll be handling the 1.9.0 > relea

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

We are good for 1.9.0 (already updated). Just wondering if we should consider 1.8.x or just move forward with 1.9. Le jeu. 3 avr. 2025 à 06:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi > > I guess we have to check the impact of > https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30065 and update if needed. >

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Hi Yuya, Thanks for reporting this issue, which is indeed a defect in the SigV4 auth manager. The fix was hopefully easy: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12582 Sorry for the inconvenience, Alex On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 5:20 AM Yuya Ebihara wrote: > S3 Tables tests in Trino with 1.9.0 n

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Agreed, let's not tie our releases to other projects if we can help it. On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 1:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Ajantha > > I will help on the Flink PR. However I don’t think we need to hold 1.9.0 > for Spark and Flink updates. We can always include that in the next rele

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Hi Ajantha I will help on the Flink PR. However I don’t think we need to hold 1.9.0 for Spark and Flink updates. We can always include that in the next release cycle. I propose to focus on issues and check the milestone on GH. Regards JB Le jeu. 27 mars 2025 à 07:11, Ajantha Bhat a écrit : >

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Latest update on the release: As discussed in the last community sync, I have waited for the Spark 4.0 release. But the RC3 has failed. Flink 2.0 has been released, there is an open PR to include it at the Iceberg. It didn't make any progress this wee

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

S3 Tables tests in Trino with 1.9.0 nightly release throws ClassCastException (RESTSigV4AuthSession → OAuth2Util$AuthSession). The test works fine in 1.8.1. I’m going to check if adjusting our test settings based on this PR ( https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11995) can fix the issue. https:/

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Hi Ajantha, Thanks for driving the release. Can we include https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12120? On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 3:18 AM Steve Loughran wrote: > > Can I get this reviewed and merged; gives all hadoop filesystems with bulk > delete calls the ability to issue bulk deletes up to th

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Can I get this reviewed and merged; gives all hadoop filesystems with bulk delete calls the ability to issue bulk deletes up to their page sizes; off by default. Tested all the way through iceberg to AWS S3 london. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10233 On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 12:32, Yuya

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Hi, can we include https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12264 to fix the S3-compatible storage issue? We downgraded the problematic library in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12339, but the issue is still present in the main branch. On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 8:47 PM Ajantha Bhat wrote: >

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

We decided to have a fast follow up on the things that missed release train of 1.8.0 during community sync. More details here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/wvz5sd7pmh5ww1yqhsxpt1kwf993276j On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 4:53 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > Can you please rehash the plan? I thought we j

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Can you please rehash the plan? I thought we just did a release last month and were aiming for a three month schedule. I may have missed something On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 6:00 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Following the plan from the 1.8.0 release, I'll be handling the 1.9.0 > relea

[Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Hey everyone, Following the plan from the 1.8.0 release, I'll be handling the 1.9.0 release. We have several major updates ready: - *Partition stats APIs:* All core APIs for partition statistics have been merged, unblocking engines like Dremio, Trino, and Hive that were waiting for this