I don't think it is a good idea to add the table name to metadata because
it can easily get stale and would be misleading. Table name is a catalog
concern and we typically try to keep catalog concerns out of the table
space. Instead, I'd suggest updating the error that your users see so that
the er
I see the table identifier (catalog.namespace.table), including the table
name, as a catalog concept rather than a table property. You can register a
table with the same location but different names, which makes sense from a
catalog perspective.
This also makes tables more portable when moving or
Hi Manu,
I'm just brainstorming about how this addition could be problematic:
Even though it's not recommended, it's feasible to register the same table
in multiple catalogs. Different catalogs could use different names for the
same underlying table, see register_table(name, metadata_location)
Hi all,
>From time to time, users ask me about the status of their Iceberg tables by
sending me a *path*, which they've received in a file system alert email.
Usually I look for the corresponding *table name *and query metadata tables
through Spark SQL.
However, it's not easy to find the table nam