Hey all, I accidentally sent this to the Iceberg devlist instead of Avro.
Thanks Steven for pinging me. Sorry for the noise!
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op do 8 aug 2024 om 18:33 schreef Xuanwo :
> +1 non-binding
>
> I support to do release separately which can reduce our verify burden.
>
> On Fri, Aug
+1 non-binding
I support to do release separately which can reduce our verify burden.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024, at 00:26, Ryan Blue wrote:
> +1 for releasing Avro Java separately.
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 8:28 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> In light of the recent discussion of r
+1 for releasing Avro Java separately.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 8:28 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> In light of the recent discussion of releasing artifacts separately [1]. I
> would like to discuss releasing Java 1.11.4. Since Java 1.12.0 only
> supports JDK11+ I think it is import
Hi everyone,
In light of the recent discussion of releasing artifacts separately [1]. I
would like to discuss releasing Java 1.11.4. Since Java 1.12.0 only
supports JDK11+ I think it is important to also do a release of Java (which
includes several CVE patches). I would like to hear if there are a
