Re: [DISCUSS] PyIceberg 0.9.1

2025-04-23 Thread Fokko Driesprong
Hey Kevin, Thanks, and I think #1878 would be great to get in. I'm working with Koen to push that over the finish line. I can cut an RC afterwards. Kind regards, Fokko Op di 22 apr 2025 om 19:54 schreef Kevin Liu : > Good catch on those 2 PRs! I agree with the assessment :) > > I just merged #1

Re: [DISCUSS] PyIceberg 0.9.1

2025-04-22 Thread Kevin Liu
Good catch on those 2 PRs! I agree with the assessment :) I just merged #1941 which is a follow up fix for #1747 . I think we should include this as well. Ideally, I would also like to get #187

Re: [DISCUSS] PyIceberg 0.9.1

2025-04-20 Thread Fokko Driesprong
Thanks Kevin! I've cherry-picked them onto the 0.9.x branch, and set the 0.9.1 milestone. Except for two PRs: - #1857 This typo fixes the transforms of the nanoseconds transforms, which are not on the 0.9.x branch. - #1863

Re: [DISCUSS] PyIceberg 0.9.1

2025-04-18 Thread Kevin Liu
Thanks for raising this Fokko! I went through all the commits since the 0.9.0 release . Here are some PRs I think would be good to include as part of 0.9.1 https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1741 https://github.com

[DISCUSS] PyIceberg 0.9.1

2025-04-17 Thread Fokko Driesprong
Hi everyone, After the 0.9.0 release, we've captured quite a few bugfixes , and it would be good to do a quick 0.9.1 patch release. I took the liberty of cherry-picking the fixes