Thanks Xuanwo for the summary.
I think it's a good idea to move c/cpp related code to iceberg-cpp repo,
and have a try on the cxx binding approach.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 6:54 PM Junwang Zhao wrote:
> Hi xuanwo
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 2:36 PM Xuanwo wrote:
>
>> After a deeper discussion w
Hi xuanwo
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 2:36 PM Xuanwo wrote:
> After a deeper discussion with friends in the Slack #cpp channel, we
> reached the following consensus:
>
>- iceberg-rust won't maintain any c/cpp related code.
>- iceberg-cpp will have an internal crate based on iceberg-rust and
After a deeper discussion with friends in the Slack #cpp channel, we reached
the following consensus:
• iceberg-rust won't maintain any c/cpp related code.
• iceberg-cpp will have an internal crate based on iceberg-rust and invokes
cxx/cbingen to build bindings
• And finally, we will have a `l
Hi Xuanwo,
Thanks for bringing this up. I'm not a cpp expert, but following this with
great interest. I think this is a very promising approach since the memory
model is already the same across projects (Arrow).
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op vr 14 mrt 2025 om 08:53 schreef Xuanwo :
> Hi, everyone
>
>
Hi, everyone
Today, Renjie Liu and I had a discussion with some of the iceberg-cpp
contributors—Gang Wu, Junwang Zhao, and David Li—about ways to advance the
project. We came up with some great ideas, so I'm sharing them here to gather
more feedback.
## Background
The community continues to s
