Re: [DISCUSS] Events Endpoint for IRC

2025-05-27 Thread Christian Thiel
Dear all, I think we have reached mostly consensus here. There is one more change since our last discussion: We removed the recursive "assumed-by" field of actors in favor or an "actor-chain" list. If there is any more need for discussion please voice it here on the Mailing List or in the Catalog

Re: [DISCUSS] Events Endpoint for IRC

2025-05-07 Thread Christian Thiel
Dear all, I worked the changes discussed in the last catalog sync into the Events proposal [1]. Those include: - Using request-id instead of transaction - A more flexible User (now called Actor) - Custom Operation type The specific diff compared to the last discussion can be best seen in my lates

Re: [DISCUSS] Events Endpoint for IRC

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Thiel
Dear all, after the last Catalog sync I updated the proposal. Changes are in the original proposal Document [1] and the original PR [2] Best, Christian [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WtIsNGVX75-_MsQIOJhXLAWg6IbplV4-DkLllQEiFT8/edit?usp=sharing [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/1

[DISCUSS] Events Endpoint for IRC

2025-03-20 Thread Christian Thiel
Dear all, We have recently discussed in the Iceberg Catalog Community Sync [1] and the Mailing List [2] different ways on how federation between Catalogs could be standardized. This proposal introduces a /events endpoint to the IRC specification. The endpoint provides events of modifications to o