Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 release

+1 for rolling back the AWS SDK update for the patch release. We should get the better fix into main though. On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 8:56 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: > @Yuya maybe it makes sense to revert the AWS SDK to a version that didn't > introduce those integrity protection changes (added

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 release

@Yuya maybe it makes sense to revert the AWS SDK to a version that didn't introduce those integrity protection changes (added in 2.30.0) for 1.8.1 and then see how we fix this properly for 1.9.0? I've opened https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12339 to do that. On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 11:24 A

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 release

Hi Eduard Thanks for volunteering for the 1.8.1 release. It makes sense to me. I'm working on some Flink related updates, but for 1.9.0. I will do a pass on GitHub Issues. Regards JB On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:27 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > we're currently tracking all is

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 release

Hi Eduard, Can we add https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12264 to 1.8.1 milestone? It handles a regression on S3-compatible storages (pre-2025 Minio, Ozone, Dell EC etc). BR, Yuya On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 6:28 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: > Hey everyone, > > we're currently tracking all iss

[DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 release

Hey everyone, we're currently tracking all issues that should go into 1.8.1 in the 1.8.1 milestone . So far, all the issues that were previously added have been backported to 1.8.x. I'm volunteering to be the release manager for 1.8.1 and the questi