Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RemovePartitionSpecsUpdate update type to REST

Thanks everyone, it seems as though there's general support for this. Since this has been open for a while for discussion, and this is a spec change I will start a separate vote thread. On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:28 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 1:56 AM Fokko Driesprong w

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RemovePartitionSpecsUpdate update type to REST

+1 On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 1:56 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > +1 Thanks for working on this > > Op di 20 aug 2024 om 04:16 schreef xianjin : > >> +1 from my side as well. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Aug 20, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Yufei Gu wrote: >> >>  >> >> +1, the new spec looks good to me.

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RemovePartitionSpecsUpdate update type to REST

+1 Thanks for working on this Op di 20 aug 2024 om 04:16 schreef xianjin : > +1 from my side as well. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 20, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Yufei Gu wrote: > >  > > +1, the new spec looks good to me. It seems like the client-side handling > the heavy lifting of figuring out w

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RemovePartitionSpecsUpdate update type to REST

+1 from my side as well.Sent from my iPhoneOn Aug 20, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Yufei Gu wrote:+1, the new spec looks good to me. It seems like the client-side handling the heavy lifting of figuring out which spec to remove is a reasonable approach. YufeiOn Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi <

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RemovePartitionSpecsUpdate update type to REST

+1, the new spec looks good to me. It seems like the client-side handling the heavy lifting of figuring out which spec to remove is a reasonable approach. Yufei On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi wrote: > Seems reasonable to me. > > - Anton > > пн, 19 серп. 2024 р. о 15:19 Amogh

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RemovePartitionSpecsUpdate update type to REST

Seems reasonable to me. - Anton пн, 19 серп. 2024 р. о 15:19 Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> пише: > Hi all, > > There has been work [1] to enable users to remove historical partition > specs which are not referenced in manifests as a form of metadata cleanup. > As part of this, a new metada

[DISCUSS] Adding RemovePartitionSpecsUpdate update type to REST

Hi all, There has been work [1] to enable users to remove historical partition specs which are not referenced in manifests as a form of metadata cleanup. As part of this, a new metadata update type RemovePartitionSpecsUpdate needs to be added to enable REST Catalogs to be able to perform this oper