Is there is a path to having an Arrow<->Parquet implementation in Java
that does not have a hard dependency on Iceberg? This is a common ask
and it seems like it would be a clear community win that would net
more contributors than something Iceberg-specific.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 2:54 PM Ryan Blu
I also joined the dev@ list to keep abreast of what's going on in
Iceberg. If all of the development activity is happening on GitHub
issues and pull requests, then it seems like all of this activity
should be mirrored to _some_ mailing list, for example
github@iceberg.a.o. This creates a searchable
.
>>
>> Anyways, my two cents.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Edgar
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 7:43 PM Saisai Shao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The issue linking, Fix Version, and assignee features of JIRA are also
>>>> h
One significant issue with GitHub issues for ASF projects is that
non-committers cannot edit issue or PR metadata (labels, requesting
reviews, etc). The lack of formalism around Resolved and Closed states can
place an extra communication burden to explain why an issue is closed.
Sometimes projects
ularity of a single
file is hidden behind Iceberg business logic, so I would encourage you
to make the lower-level single file interface as accessible to general
Arrow users as possible.
> -Dan
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:03 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
>>
>> hi Anton,
>>
>> O
hi Anton,
On point #5, I would suggest doing the work either in Apache Arrow or
in the Parquet Java project -- we are developing both Parquet C++ and
Rust codebases within the apache/arrow repository so I think you would
find an active community there. I know that there has been a lot of
interest
t; >
> > Uwe
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019, at 10:20 AM, Joel Pfaff wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the write-up.
> > >
> > > Have you considered sharing this document with the Apache Iceberg
> > community?
> &g
ff wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks for the write-up.
> >
> > Have you considered sharing this document with the Apache Iceberg community?
> >
> > My feeling is that there are some shared goals here between the two
> > projects.
> > And while the
