Hello!
Glad to help here and also present our use case on iceberg
Thanks!
Nan
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 3:00 PM Jay Dave wrote:
> Hello JB:
>
> I am interested and help in whatever I can.
>
> Thanks
> JD
> --
> *From:* Brian Olsen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 19, 2023
Thanks! yeah, I'd like to join the meeting, April 19 works for me best!
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:41 PM Samrose Ahmed
wrote:
> I'd love to join this discussion, all those times work for me.
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 9:35 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
>
>> The 19th works best for me.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1
t;
> Ryan
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 7:19 PM Nan Zhu wrote:
>
>> can we consider having https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/5083 in
>> before releasing a new iceberg version with Spark 3.3 support?
>>
>> the issue being addressed there is a breaking change
can we consider having https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/5083 in
before releasing a new iceberg version with Spark 3.3 support?
the issue being addressed there is a breaking change from iceberg + spark
3.1 to iceberg + spark 3.2 and above...and it essentially blocks us from
upgrading to highe
+1 for using rust as the backbone for new language bindings
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 23:52 OpenInx wrote:
> Thanks Kyle for sharing your context.
>
> Recently, I also spent some time practicing my Rust skills. Generally,
> I'm +1 for adding Rust SDK support for native language.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun
tested with internal cases with some focus on a few changes we made in this
version, looks good from my perspective
+1
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:08 PM Kyle Bendickson wrote:
> Thank you, Jack!
>
> Quick announcement when testing: *the runtime jars / artifacts for Spark
> & Flink have changed na
