Re: Welcoming Russell Spitzer as a new committer

Congrats Russell! Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 29, 2021, at 9:41 AM, Dilip Biswal wrote: > >  > Congratulations Russel !! Very well deserved, indeed !! > >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:13 AM Miao Wang wrote: >> Congratulations Russell! >> >> >> >> Miao >> >> >> >> From: Szehon Ho >>

Re: Nested Column Pruning in Iceberg (DSV2) ..

Super! That’d be great. Lemme know if I can help in any way. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 30, 2019, at 6:30 PM, Anton Okolnychyi > wrote: > > Hi Gautam, > > Iceberg does support nested schema pruning but Spark doesn’t request this for > DS V2 in 2.4. Internally, we had to modify Spark 2.4 t

Re: Encouraging performance results for Vectorized Iceberg code

Thanks Anjali and Samarth, These look good! Great progress. Can you push your changes to the vectorized-read branch please? Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 8, 2019, at 11:56 AM, Anjali Norwood wrote: > > Good suggestion Ryan. Added dev@iceberg now. > > Dev: Please see early vectorized Icebe

Re: Option to disable rewrites of IN predicates

+1 to implementing IN feature instead. We are also looking for IN / NOT-IN cases where the inclusion/exclusion set is very large. -Gautam Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Anton Okolnychyi > wrote: > > For some reason, I thought there was a blocker there. As Iceberg is not

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2019, at 6:56 AM, RD wrote: > > +1 > >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:01 PM John Zhuge wrote: >> +1 >> >>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:59 PM Xabriel Collazo Mojica >>> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> Xabriel J Collazo Mojica | Senior Software Engineer | Ado

Re: [VOTE] Community code reviews

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 28, 2019, at 10:09 PM, Daniel Weeks wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On 2019/02/27 21:11:01, Ryan Blue wrote: > > This is a follow-up to the discussion thread, where we seem to have> > > consensus around the proposal to allow committers to commit their own pull>