Hi all,
Wanted to see if there were any remaining action items or discussions remaining
on this topic. I’m trying to get a gauge of how close we might be on getting
this merged!
Best,
Adnan Hemani
On 2025/05/28 17:33:20 Christian Thiel wrote:
> Thank you all for the great discussion today!
> I
I'm interested in working on this change as well. I think it pairs nicely
with the proposal for per column structs for statistics.
Thanks,
Harman
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 9:43 PM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> It’s not required at compile time, only at test runtime.
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Hi everyone,
I am new to the Iceberg community but would love to participate in these
discussions to reduce the number of file writes, especially for small
writes/commits.
Thank you!
-Jagdeep
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 4:02 PM Anurag Mantripragada
wrote:
> We have been hitting all the metadata pro
Hi Haizhou Zhao,
Thanks for the detailed use-cases!
Quick question for the Use Case 1: Do you have a primary key to identify
the updated rows? How wide, complicated is this key? Is the ranking always
recalculated for the full partition? If so the discussion around the wide
tables (https://lists.a
Hi everyone,
I did some experiments with splitting up wide Parquet files into multiple
column families. You can check the PR here:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13306.
What the test does:
- Creates tables with 100/1000/1 columns, where the column type is
double
- Generates
