Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the v3 spec

Hi Ryan All good for the spec. The idea for release is just a help to "double check" the spec is good (we already saw some slightly changes on the spec while working on release). I think we can be "confident" that we won't have unexpected change. Thanks ! Regards JB On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 7:04 P

Re: [Discuss] Iceberg 1.9.1 Release

Hi Russ Yes, agree. Your PR is good and already merged. I don't have anything blocker for 1.9.1 (still working on source-ids, but definitely not for 1.9.1). Thanks ! Regards JB On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 11:47 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > > Hey y'all! > > Thanks to @suilis we have learned that Iceb

Re: [Announce] Seattle Apache Iceberg Community Meetup 5/6

Hey everyone, The Seattle Iceberg Community meetup is happening next Tuesday on May 6. Sign up is still at https://lu.ma/njczsmlu. We have 3 great talks lined up: - Multi-File Format for Apache Iceberg - Using Iceberg and Lance to Accelerate Your ML/AI Workloads - Iceberg in the browser - Iceberg

[Discuss] Iceberg 1.9.1 Release

Hey y'all! Thanks to @suilis we have learned that IcebergBuild.version() is returning unspecified for Iceberg 1.9.0. I have a PR up to fix this and I think this is a clear reason to do a 1.9.1 as soon a

Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the v3 spec

Sounds good to me, I think we can move ahead with this, for all intents and purposes I think we are past any breaking changes for Spec V3 and should consider it "stable" for implementation purposes. I want to work on some official descriptions of our spec versioning / library process to better expl

Re: Feathercast: 1.9.0 release

> On Apr 29, 2025, at 8:07 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On 2025/04/29 06:32:45 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> Hi Rich >> >> That's a great idea. What about a couple of community members for the >> feather cast ? >> I'm happy to help if needed. > > > Thanks to everyone who has responded. I don'