Re: [DISCUSS] Spec update to cover compressed JSON metadata files

Hey Micah, For some reason, your email ended up in my spam box 😨 There is a reason for everything! .gz.metadata.json is quite uncommon and can't be read by most existing > tools. Would it be better to support .metadata.json.gz and treat > .gz.metadata.json as legacy for backward compatibility?

Re: [DISCUSS] Spec update to cover compressed JSON metadata files

I've copied my comments from GitHub here for a broader discussion: Hi, I have two concerns about this change: • `.gz.metadata.json` is quite uncommon and can't be read by most existing tools. Would it be better to support `.metadata.json.gz` and treat `.gz.metadata.json` as legacy for backwar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 RC2

Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 RC2. The vote result is: +1: 5 (binding), 4 (non-binding) +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) Therefore, the release candidate is passed. - Ajantha On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 9:53 PM Aihua

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

+1 (binding) 1. Verified sigs/checksum/license 2. Ran "make test-coverage" using python 3.10 Thanks Fokko for driving this release! Best, Honah On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 9:43 PM Sung Yun wrote: > Thank you Fokko for running this release! > > +1 (non-binding) > > I verified signatures, checksums