Hi everyone,
FYI, the next community python library sync meeting will be on Tuesday
(04/29/2025) at 9 AM (US/Pacific). Here is the meeting agenda with the
topics to discuss:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oMKodaZJrOJjPfc8PDVAoTdl02eGQKHlhwuggiw7s9U/edit?pli=1&tab=t.0#bookmark=kix.qmp59vb0i122
Hi Jan,
> The view is executed when it's being referenced in a SQL statement. That
statement contains the information for the query engine to resolve the
catalog of the view.
If I’m understanding correctly, that means:
* If the view is queried as SELECT * FROM catalogA.namespace.view, then
catal
Hi Amogh/Drew/Fokko and Iceberg community,
Thank you for the feedback. As you point out, I will update the document
and add a section to clarify what we mean by each isolation level. I read
through the linked PR as well, this proposal is along the lines of *"1.
Coordinate table loading with the ca
+1 Binding
Did the normal tests
Rat Check and such
Signature Checks out - Eduard's
-- I do keep having an issue with some of the S3 Signing tests which
require me to keep adjusting my local config inorder for the tests to past.
(Requested ports already bound) So that would be nice to clean up if
p
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025, 3:12 PM Anton Okolnychyi
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> The proposed V3 behavior would already be a lot more flexible than what
> most engines support in the industry today. It is also not covered by the
> SQL standard, so there is no need to overcomplicate the spec
+1 (binding)
The proposed V3 behavior would already be a lot more flexible than what
most engines support in the industry today. It is also not covered by the
SQL standard, so there is no need to overcomplicate the spec without actual
use cases.
- Anton
ср, 23 квіт. 2025 р. о 10:27 Ryan Blue пи
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 8:39 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
> Op wo 23 apr 2025 om 03:08 schreef Gang Wu :
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 4:42 AM Prashant Singh
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Prashant
+1 (binding)
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op wo 23 apr 2025 om 03:08 schreef Gang Wu :
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 4:42 AM Prashant Singh
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Prashant Singh
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 2:55 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>> etudenhoef...@apache.org
Hey Kevin,
Thanks, and I think #1878 would be great to get in. I'm working with Koen
to push that over the finish line. I can cut an RC afterwards.
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op di 22 apr 2025 om 19:54 schreef Kevin Liu :
> Good catch on those 2 PRs! I agree with the assessment :)
>
> I just merged #1
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- Signature and checksum are good
- ASF header present in all expected file in the source distribution
- No binary file found in the source distribution
- LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the source distribution
- Build works from the source distribution
- Tested without prob
+1 (non-binding)
Polaris CI, including regression tests, is green:
https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1309
Thanks,
Alex
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 12:37 AM Yuya Ebihara <
yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I confirmed that Trino CI is green. It runs tests against se
11 matches
Mail list logo
