Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 8:43 AM Honah J. wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 17:42 xianjin wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Apr 19, 2025, at 12:19 AM, Steve Zhang >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Steve Zhang >> >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Table Identifiers in Iceberg View Spec

Hi, Walaa: Thanks for the proposal. I've reviewed the doc, but in general I have some concerns with resolving catalog names on the fly with query engine defined catalog names. This introduces some flexibility at first glance, but also makes misconfiguration difficult to explain. But I agree with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 RC0

Hi, Yes to use helper tool. For versions, I'm not a big fan generally speaking because LICENSE/NOTICE can change from a version to another For permissive dependencies (like BSD/MIT), it's important to specify the version of the dependency as licenses sometimes change as product versions change.

Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1 (non-binding) On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 11:22 Fokko Driesprong wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Op zo 20 apr 2025 om 05:59 schreef Daniel Weeks : > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025, 12:07 AM Gang Wu wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:12 PM Steve Zhang >>> wro

Re: [DISCUSS] PyIceberg 0.9.1

Thanks Kevin! I've cherry-picked them onto the 0.9.x branch, and set the 0.9.1 milestone. Except for two PRs: - #1857 This typo fixes the transforms of the nanoseconds transforms, which are not on the 0.9.x branch. - #1863

Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1 (binding) Op zo 20 apr 2025 om 05:59 schreef Daniel Weeks : > +1 (binding) > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2025, 12:07 AM Gang Wu wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:12 PM Steve Zhang >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Steve Zhang >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 18, 2