+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 7:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
> Iceberg 1.7.2 release.
>
> The commit ID is f057e877bdbdb6a3361d45b777b8b1a8e56ee816
> * This corresponds to the tag: ap
I assume Flink 2.0 will remove the old source and sink interfaces.
With the above assumption (please correct me if I am wrong), here is what I
would suggest for the next Iceberg release (1.9 or whichever version that
lands the Flink 2.0 support).
- Flink 2.0 module - remove the old source and sink
Hi everyone,
It’s time for a board report again. Here’s my current draft. Thanks to Dan
for helping put it together while I’m unexpectedly out of the office. Sorry
if it is light on activity for some languages! Please let me know if
there’s anything I can add and I’ll try to get it in tomorrow. Th
Thanks for organizing, Sung! See y'all in a few weeks :)
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:48 AM Kevin Liu wrote:
> Amazing! Thanks for putting this together. See you there :)
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 3:17 PM Russell Spitzer
> wrote:
>
>> I'm flying in early enough to join as well!
>>
>> On Mon, M
Hi Sung Yun,
That's awesome ! Thanks for that !
I will be there :)
Thanks again,
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 4:01 PM Sung Yun wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Join us for a Pre-Summit Community Meetup ahead of the very first
> in-person Apache Iceberg Summit! This event will be hosted by
> B
Amazing! Thanks for putting this together. See you there :)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 3:17 PM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> I'm flying in early enough to join as well!
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 4:38 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
>
>> Nice, thanks for organizing this Sung, and thanks to Bloomberg for
>>
Hi Everyone,
Join us for a Pre-Summit Community Meetup ahead of the very first
in-person Apache Iceberg Summit! This event will be hosted by
Bloomberg’s Engineering Department in San Francisco, on Monday, April
7 2025, between 5:30 - 8:00 PM PDT.
There will be light refreshments and lightning tal
Hi Max
Yes, it makes sense. Maybe I can help on that as I'm working on Spec
V3 support in Flink (I did the default value, and I'm checking the new
types now).
Please let me know :)
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:23 AM Maximilian Michels wrote:
>
> Hi JB,
>
> Yes, Flink 2.0 suppo
Hi JB,
Yes, Flink 2.0 support ideally should land in Iceberg 1.9.
Hi Rodrigo,
+1 on closing the gap between the two sink implementations: FlinkSink
and IcebergSink. Thanks for helping to close that gap!
Hi Steven,
Good point on the "Remove by Iceberg 2.0" claim stated in FlinkSource.
We can ke
