Hi everyone,
I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
Iceberg 1.7.2 release.
The commit ID is 6323aa9405f23e3992f243b1134cbafdbb24d73c
* This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc1
* https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc1
*
https://g
Woot! Thanks for running the release, Drew! And thanks for verifying,
everyone. We'll work on getting the final artifact published.
Best,
Kevin Liu
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 1:32 PM Drew wrote:
> Thanks everyone for voting!!
>
> The 72 hours have passed, and a minimum of 3 binding votes have been
Thanks everyone for voting!!
The 72 hours have passed, and a minimum of 3 binding votes have been cast:
- +1: 3 (binding), 2 (non-binding)
- +0: 0
- -1: 0
The release candidate has been officially accepted as *PyIceberg 0.9.0*.
Thank you again for your participation! The announcement will be sen
Thanks everyone. It seems like there is a consensus, and I'll go ahead and
mark the field as deprecated for now to avoid any future confusion.
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op di 25 feb 2025 om 00:54 schreef Ajantha Bhat :
> +1 to deprecate it again and remove it later on.
>
> I did some digging and found
+1 (binding)
checked signatures/checksums/license and ran tests via "make test-coverage".
Thanks everyone
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 3:10 PM Sung Yun wrote:
> Hi Drew, thank you very much for running the release!
>
> +1 non-binding:
>
> I've verified the signatures, the checksums and the licensing
Hi Drew, thank you very much for running the release!
+1 non-binding:
I've verified the signatures, the checksums and the licensing.
Ran tests with "make test-coverage"
Sung
On 2025/03/03 05:01:18 "Honah J." wrote:
> Thanks Drew for running the release!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>- Checked signa
Hi Team,
I have a use-case of writing data into an icebergtable using spark.
The table has 3 partition columns (file_date, city, creation_date) and
a bucket by another column (user_id,4).
"partition-specs" : [ {
"spec-id" : 0,
"fields" : [ {
"name" : "file_date",
"transfor
