Thanks everyone for participating.
The vote result is:
+1: 6 (binding), 8 (non-binding)
+0: 0
-1: 0
Therefore, the release candidate is passed.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:53 PM Steve Zhang
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Checked signature/SHA512
> - Ran RAT license check
> - Ran tests on JDK1
FYI: there was an effort from Jan (cc'd) to introduce a total order for
floating-point numbers on the Parquet side: [1][2].
[1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/221
[2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/196
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 4:24 AM Devin Smith
wrote:
> The spec h
Thanks Alex.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:31 AM Alex Dutra
wrote:
> Hi Aihua,
>
> I was indeed suspecting that you had a custom RESTClient :-) Thanks for
> digging further and clarifying! Let me know if you need my help in adapting
> your code.
>
> And with that: +1 (non-binding) from me as well.
+1 (non-binding)
- Checked signature/SHA512
- Ran RAT license check
- Ran tests on JDK17
Thanks,
Steve Zhang
> On Feb 27, 2025, at 11:45 AM, Daniel Weeks wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17)
>
> -Dan
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 11:30 AM Aihua Xu
+1 (binding)
Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17)
-Dan
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 11:30 AM Aihua Xu wrote:
> Thanks Alex.
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:31 AM Alex Dutra
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Aihua,
>>
>> I was indeed suspecting that you had a custom RESTClient :-) Thanks for
>> digging fu
Hi Aihua,
I was indeed suspecting that you had a custom RESTClient :-) Thanks for
digging further and clarifying! Let me know if you need my help in adapting
your code.
And with that: +1 (non-binding) from me as well.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 6:45 PM Aihua Xu wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
Hi Alex,
I checked our code further. We have an internal implementation
for RESTClient which needs an update after your change to place the token
in DefaultAuthSession and not pass through initHeaders anymore. The
existing code assumes the token coming from initHeaders and we need to make
the chan
Hi Aihua Xu,
I reviewed your PR but without further details I do not agree with your
change, and I am unable to reproduce the issue. Besides, we have unit
tests that cover this extensively.
Could you please provide a simple reproducer or a test case?
Thanks!
Alex
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 5:06 P
Conclusion in today's meeting:
- Test against latest version in CI (by updating Cargo.lock with
dependabot)
- Have a wider range of versions support, to allow users to choose their
dep version (by not updating Cargo.toml too often). Perhaps need to add a
CI to test against oldest version.
On Thu,
I'm running within our integration tests. I'm able to trace and find the
breaking change: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11992.
Seems we need to make the following changes to pass the token:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12415/files. Alex, can you help take
a look at this?
if (ha
Thanks for the discussion on this topic during the community sync!
Let me sum up what we discussed and also follow-up with some additional
thoughts.
*Summary:*
As long as the table is there users can run orphan file cleanup to remove
the orphaned stat files.
If you drop the table the orphaned stat
Bumping this thread again.
I received this SQL from a user today.
CREATE TABLE partition_by_epoch_timestamp (
> `id` STRING,
> `data` DECIMAL(10,0),
> `start_ts` DECIMAL(10,0),
> `end_ts` DECIMAL(10,0)
> )
> USING iceberg
> PARTITIONED BY (
> days(from_unixtime(start_ts))
> )
Of c
Hi Aihua,
I just tested 1.8.1 with Polaris OSS and I am not seeing anything
different. Can you share your setup?
Below is my Spark setup.
Thanks,
Alex
./gradlew run
token=$(curl -s http://localhost:8181/api/catalog/v1/oauth/tokens \
--user root: \
-d grant_type=client_credentials \
-d s
13 matches
Mail list logo