Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg (java) 1.8.0 release

Thanks Amogh I updated the PR with some cleanups. Regards JB On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 4:04 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks JB I left a review, it'll be good to get another set of eyes on it! > Thank you for surfacing and fixing these issues, it's very appreciated. > > Amo

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg (java) 1.8.0 release

Thanks JB I left a review, it'll be good to get another set of eyes on it! Thank you for surfacing and fixing these issues, it's very appreciated. Amogh Jahagirdar On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 12:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Here's the PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12195 for ref.

Re: Proposal: Parquet footer size in Iceberg metadata

+1 I think this is probably useful for wider schemas that typically have larger footers that go past the heuristic. It would be good to have some concrete numbers on how much this impacts workloads before committing to it. Cheers, Micah On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 7:10 AM Steve Loughran wrote: >

Re: [Proposal] Automating the PyIceberg Release Process

Hey folks, Just following up on this thread. The `iceberg-python` release process has been updated at the "How to Release" documentation (#1391 ). The process now

Re: [VOTE] Add Geometry and Geography types for V3

+1 Op za 8 feb 2025 om 08:08 schreef Péter Váry : > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025, 21:20 Kevin Liu wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> It's great to see support for more data types in both parquet and >> Iceberg! >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 12:11 PM huaxin gao >> wrote: >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Simplify multi-arg table metadata

Missed the thread, but with v3 now much closer than before, agree that the gain is not worth the risk. Thanks! Szehon On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 11:52 PM Xianjin Ye wrote: > +1. I think it's good timing to allow multi-arg transform for V3 and > onwards only. > > On 2025/02/03 18:26:00 "Driesprong,