> Given what I read about the company, they will most likely ignore you.
Some people think the company is a scam, and they seem to engage in
unethical business practices.
Yeah, but it absolutely does not mean we should give up and do nothing.
Hopefully that will give at least some people a pause
Ok. Thanks for the details.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 12:21 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> Hey Ajantha,
>
> As mentioned in the 1.7.2 DISCUSS thread, we don't want to leave the 1.7.x
> version in a broken state. Since the 1.8.x ships with new features, it will
> require more thorough testing. I stil
Hey Ajantha,
As mentioned in the 1.7.2 DISCUSS thread, we don't want to leave the 1.7.x
version in a broken state. Since the 1.8.x ships with new features, it will
require more thorough testing. I still think it would be good to get 1.7.2
to the public ASAP.
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op ma 27 jan 2025
Hi JB and Fokko,
Since 1.8.0 RC is planned for tomorrow[1],
Just wondering if we really need 1.7.2?
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/wvz5sd7pmh5ww1yqhsxpt1kwf993276j
- Ajantha
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose that we release the follo
Hi,
Given what I read about the company, they will most likely ignore you. Some
people think the company is a scam, and they seem to engage in unethical
business practices.
Kind Regards,
Justin
+1
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 3:01 PM John Zhuge wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> John Zhuge
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 2:59 PM Aihua Xu wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding).
>>
>> Thanks for fixing it.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:30 AM Anton Okolnychyi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 good catch
>>>
>>> нд, 26
+1 (non-binding)
John Zhuge
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 2:59 PM Aihua Xu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks for fixing it.
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:30 AM Anton Okolnychyi
> wrote:
>
>> +1 good catch
>>
>> нд, 26 січ. 2025 р. о 08:33 Steve Zhang
>> пише:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> T
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks for fixing it.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:30 AM Anton Okolnychyi
wrote:
> +1 good catch
>
> нд, 26 січ. 2025 р. о 08:33 Steve Zhang
> пише:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve Zhang
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2025, at 10:48 AM, huaxin gao wrote:
>>
>> +1 (non-bin
Hi everyone,
I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
Iceberg 1.7.2 release.
The commit ID is c2105b2634becf68b3fdabd0ee6fb0b6e93d4f0c
* This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0
* https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0
*
https://g
Hi Amogh,
Thanks !
I agree we should have more frequent releases, but also more
"predictable" release time and give visibility to the community
(especially users).
Some ASF projects are providing "tables" with release plans:
- https://camel.apache.org/download/
- https://karaf.apache.org/download
+1 good catch
нд, 26 січ. 2025 р. о 08:33 Steve Zhang
пише:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Zhang
>
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2025, at 10:48 AM, huaxin gao wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Steve Zhang
> On Jan 25, 2025, at 10:48 AM, huaxin gao wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
BTW. Next escalation step if this does not help will be to go to all the
repos where those users created the issues and comment on them, explain the
situation and to ask them to react in similar ways. There are quite a
number of those repos now - react, Pinot, Typescript, .
On Sun, Jan 26, 202
Starting at Linkedin. They don't seem to be on Mastodon or Bluesky, I quit
X and don't care any more for content there.
-> if you would like to share it, feel free:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jarekpotiuk_outlier-you-are-doing-it-wrong-please-activity-7289278690213990400-MOuC
J.
On Sun, J
Ok. The issue continues. I am raising to a bit higher level and start to
complain on https://outlier.ai/ in social media - they are driving those
issues.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 7:59 PM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> Obviously as an OSS Dev I don't mind folks profiting from the work I'm
> doing as
> l
15 matches
Mail list logo
