My initial comment on this is that neither Go nor Rust, to my knowledge,
support dynamic loading in this way. So formalization of rs-, cpp- or go-
prefixes like this wouldn't be useful in any meaningful way as they would
need to be linked in ahead of time for it to work.
There are probably very ha
Generally it makes sense to define separate language-specific
configurations.
I think we need to think about the following items:
1. Is it python-specific to add the prefix? Should Rust/Go be -rs/-go as
the convention?
2. Which part of the spec is the best place to describe this? It seems that
we
Hi everyone,
FYI, the next community python library sync meeting will be on Tuesday
(01/28/2025) at 9 AM (US/Pacific). Here is the meeting agenda for the
topics to discuss:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oMKodaZJrOJjPfc8PDVAoTdl02eGQKHlhwuggiw7s9U/edit?tab=t.0#bookmark=kix.2ex1x7hr04sa.
Pleas
Looks like we are unanimous now, I can wait another day just in case anyone
has last minute comments and I"ll merge tomorrow.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 3:55 PM Daniel Weeks wrote:
> +1
>
> Sorry to have missed the discussion, but I'm onboard with the proposed
> changes.
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at
+1
Sorry to have missed the discussion, but I'm onboard with the proposed
changes.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 11:27 AM Yufei Gu wrote:
> +1
> Yufei
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 11:05 AM huaxin gao
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Thanks Russell.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:55 AM Fokko D
Hi everyone,
Happy New Year! I’m excited about all the amazing events planned for 2025,
especially the upcoming Iceberg Summit.
As some of you may know, I’ve been actively involved in organizing meetups
in both Seattle and the SF/Bay Area. I’ve also supported others in planning
and hosting meetup
+1
Yufei
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 11:05 AM huaxin gao wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks Russell.
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:55 AM Fokko Driesprong
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks Russell
>>
>> Op do 23 jan 2025 om 18:47 schreef Aihua Xu :
>>
>>> + (non binding).
>>>
>>> Thanks Russell.
>>>
+1 (non binding)
Thanks Russell.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:55 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks Russell
>
> Op do 23 jan 2025 om 18:47 schreef Aihua Xu :
>
>> + (non binding).
>>
>> Thanks Russell.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 2:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non bi
Obviously as an OSS Dev I don't mind folks profiting from the work I'm
doing as
long as they collaborate with the community in good faith. But this feels
like well beyond
the pale in creating additional work only in bad faith, but also not as a
member
of the community.
Personally it's very upsetti
Generally I think the only viable way to fight with such AI slop is to
find cheap ways on how to feed them back with even more garbage :). One of
my favourite projects in that space is "AI Granny" done by O2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RV_SdCfZ-0s -> go and watch it :)
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at
> This ultimately means they train AI on the contributors & maintainers.
> Either indirectly -- by extending high quality projects, or directly -- by
> observing how project maintainers react to these issues.
> Since the maintainers' time is a 'free resource' for them, it economically
> makes sense
+1
Thanks Russell
Op do 23 jan 2025 om 18:47 schreef Aihua Xu :
> + (non binding).
>
> Thanks Russell.
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 2:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:51 PM Russell Spitzer
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey Y'al
Hi
This ultimately means they train AI on the contributors & maintainers.
Either indirectly -- by extending high quality projects, or directly -- by
observing how project maintainers react to these issues.
Since the maintainers' time is a 'free resource' for them, it economically
makes sense :(
FYI - I got some information where it originated from. Basically this is
one of a "crowdsource expert humans to train AI" platforms - where they pay
people for some AI tasks.
Apparently they are running some campaign to "crowdsource" training the AI
by human experts to write better issues. They us
+ (non binding).
Thanks Russell.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 2:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:51 PM Russell Spitzer
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Y'all
> >
> > Yet another Row Lineage Spec update. This adds a MetadataUpdate
> EnableRowLi
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:51 PM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
>
> Hey Y'all
>
> Yet another Row Lineage Spec update. This adds a MetadataUpdate
> EnableRowLineage to the REST Spec. We briefly talked today
> about an alternative EnableFeature(Feature Name) API instead but i
Just as a little follow up - I think I have a hypothesis about what
happened.
We got one other user creating one issue which was very similar and from
this comment I gather:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/45940#issuecomment-2608307111
* there is some tool out there that is supposed to m
+1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 4:49 AM Honah J. wrote:
> +1, thanks Russell!
>
> Best regards,
> Honah
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 6:49 PM Renjie Liu
> wrote:
>
>> +1, thanks Russell for driving this!
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 8:12 AM Russell Spitzer <
>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
18 matches
Mail list logo
