What would the community think of exploiting tags for preventing concurrent
maintenance loop executions.
The issue:
Some maintenance tasks couldn't run parallel, like DeleteOrphanFiles vs.
ExpireSnapshots, or RewriteDataFiles vs. RewriteManifestFiles. We make
sure, not to run tasks started by a si
Yes, correct, thanks Manu for pointing it out.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM Manu Zhang wrote:
>
> I think Jan already created it
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10043
>
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré 于2024年3月28日 周四16:46写道：
>>
>> Hi Walaa,
>>
>> Yes, I think it would be
Hi Team,
As discussed on yesterday's community sync, I am working on adding a
possibility to the Flink Iceberg connector to run maintenance tasks on the
Iceberg tables. This will fix the small files issues and in the long run
help compacting the high number of positional and equality deletes creat
I think Jan already created it
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10043
Jean-Baptiste Onofré 于2024年3月28日 周四16:46写道：
> Hi Walaa,
>
> Yes, I think it would be great to create the GH Issue with the
> proposal template, it would allow us to track the proposal and link
> the doc (the comments sh
Hi, Walaa:
+1 for creating a github issue for tracking it with a new template.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:47 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Walaa,
>
> Yes, I think it would be great to create the GH Issue with the
> proposal template, it would allow us to track the proposal and link
> the d
Hi Walaa,
Yes, I think it would be great to create the GH Issue with the
proposal template, it would allow us to track the proposal and link
the doc (the comments should go in the doc directly).
Please, let me know if I can help on that.
I'm working on a PR to list the proposals on the website an
