Re: [DISCUSS] Include Spark 3.5 support in 1.4?

+1 for having a regular release pace clearly defined. This helps to increase adoption in industry. From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré Date: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 16:22 To: aokolnyc...@apple.com.invalid Cc: Iceberg Dev List Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Include Spark 3.5 support in 1.4? Hi Anton,

Re: i want to subscribe

Hey Ted, You need to send this email to dev-subscr...@iceberg.apache.org, you sent it to the main mailing list. Any future email will be to the dev@ address though. On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:36 AM ted lin wrote: > i want to subscribe >

i want to subscribe

i want to subscribe

[VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0 RC3

Hi Everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.5.0 release. This includes the performance issue that was discovered in RC2. A summary of what's included in 0.5.0: - Add gzip metadata support - PyArrow HDFS s

Re: September board report

Hi Brian, sorry for the late reply (I'm back from vacation and unstack my Apache emails :)). The doc is almost ready now, I will share on the mailing list soon (with a quick summary directly in the email). Thanks ! Regards JB On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 1:14 PM Brian Olsen wrote: > > Hey JB, let me

Re: [DISCUSS] Include Spark 3.5 support in 1.4?

Hi Anton, I think we can increase our release pace (I'm volunteer to deal with releases if it helps). For 1.4, I'm working on removing the deprecated API in AwsProperties (the PR should be there pretty soon). Imho, it would be great to have a regular release pace clearly defined on the website fo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.0

Hi Fokko, I agree: let's move forward on 0.5.0 release and we can submit 0.5.1 very soon after 0.5.0. Thanks ! Regards JB On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 7:15 PM Driesprong, Fokko wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > After an issue on Github, I noticed a bug in PyIceberg that the filesystem > isn't being reus