On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 3:23 PM Ryan Blue wrote:
> I don't think that we should introduce nanosecond precision types without
> at least supporting both timestamp and timestamptz. I'm not sure whether
> nanosecond time should be supported.
>
SGTM; this seems to be the most agreeable part of the p
Hi Jacob
I agree with 1, it makes sense to use nanosecond precision. IMHO it
should be available for both timestamp and timestamptz.
For 2, I'm not sure. Let's see what the others think.
Regards
JB
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:17 PM Jacob Marble
wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> I would like to pro
