Re: two proposed spec changes

+1 for 1). For 2), I don’t think allowing optional field in identifier field would be a good idea. If I understand correctly, identifier fields is quite similar to primary key in relation database. In standard sql standard, NULL != NULL. If optional field is allowed, then two rows (1, NULL), (1

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing first Apache Iceberg Summit

It sounds great :) I will include a note in the proposal doc about that. Regards JB Le mer. 23 août 2023 à 14:14, Brian Olsen a écrit : > Out of curiosity, is anyone strongly opposed to doing antics like this for > summits? > > https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFnr63che7wYFsknFAqisURvfm96rW0

two proposed spec changes

Good afternoon, I would like to propose two changes to the Iceberg spec: 1) * Primitive types time, timestamp, timestamptz gain property "precision",* with three possible values: millis, micros, nanos (borrowing the list from Parquet

Re: [DISCUSS] Default format version for new tables?

Here is a PR to change the default format version in the library: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8381 There are some failing REST catalog tests, which look like bugs. I'd appreciate if someone could take a look. I will also check the remaining tests later today. - Anton On 2023/05/29 1

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing first Apache Iceberg Summit

Out of curiosity, is anyone strongly opposed to doing antics like this for summits? https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFnr63che7wYFsknFAqisURvfm96rW0Dr On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 6:58 PM Matt Topol wrote: > I don't think I'll have much time to contribute to help, but I would > absolutely help if