Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Jahagirdar, Amogh
+1 (non-binding) Verified signature/checksums/license/build/tests with JDK 8 Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar From: Yufei Gu Reply-To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" Date: Monday, October 10, 2022 at 11:52 PM To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0 CAU

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Yufei Gu
+1 (non-binding) - Verified Signature - Verified Checksum - Verified License - Verified build and test with Java 11 - Test with Apache Spark 3.3 Best, Yufei `This is not a contribution` On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:07 PM Rushan Jiang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > - Verify Signature > - Verify Che

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Rushan Jiang
+1 (non-binding) - Verify Signature - Verify Checksums - Verify License Documentation - Verify Build and Test in Java 8 and 11 On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:11 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (java 8) > > Everything checks out, > -Dan > > On Mon, Oct 1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Ye, Jack
+1 (binding) Checked license, signature Ran checksum Ran build and test in java 8 and 11 Ran against EMR 6.8 Spark and Trino Best, Jack Ye From: Daniel Weeks Reply-To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" Date: Monday, October 10, 2022 at 4:12 PM To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Daniel Weeks
+1 (binding) Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (java 8) Everything checks out, -Dan On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 3:25 PM Steven Wu wrote: > Never mind. Missed the information that this 1.0.0 is based on the latest > 0.14.1 release, which doesn't contain the PR 5318. I thought it was based > on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Steven Wu
Never mind. Missed the information that this 1.0.0 is based on the latest 0.14.1 release, which doesn't contain the PR 5318. I thought it was based on the latest master branch. +1 (non-binding) - Verify signature - Verify checksum - Tried SQL insert and query with Flink 1.15 On Mon, Oct 10, 2022

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Steven Wu
Ryan, It seems that this PR (merged on July 28) for the Flink FLIP-27 source is not included. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/5318 The commit ID still contains the old file in the old location. The new location should be "flink/source/IcebergTableSource.java" with FLIP-27 config support. h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Szehon Ho
Whoops, sorry for the noise, I made a typo and was using the wrong scala version of the iceberg-spark-runtime jar, this works. +1 (non-binding) - Verify signature - Verify checksum - Verify license documentation - Tried with Spark 3.3 - Ran unit tests Thanks Szehon On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Szehon Ho
Hi, I get a NoClassDefFoundError from IcebergSparkExtensions when running Spark 3.3, with iceberg-spark-runtime-3.3_2.12-1.0.0.jar. I noticed this jar doesn't contain scala classes, unlike previous jars iceberg-spark-runtime-3.3_2.12-0.14.1.jar. scala> spark.sql("show databases").show java.lang.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Eduard Tudenhoefner
+1 (non-binding) - validated checksum and signature - checked license docs & ran RAT checks - ran build and tests with JDK11 Eduard On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 8:01 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > >- Verified the Spark runtime jar contents. >- Checked license docs,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0

2022-10-10 Thread Driesprong, Fokko
+1 (non-binding) - Ran the license and checksum - Ran test suite of Trino against 1.0.0 and didn't see any issues Cheers, Fokko Op ma 10 okt. 2022 om 08:00 schreef Ajantha Bhat : > +1 (non-binding) > > >- Verified the Spark runtime jar contents. >- Checked license docs, ran RAT checks.