+1 from me. I think the new site looks great and it is a big improvement to
have version-specific docs. Thanks for all your work on this, Sam!
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 5:48 PM Sam Redai wrote:
> Hey Everyone,
>
> With 0.13.0's approval for release, I think this would be a good time to
> have a di
Hey Everyone,
With 0.13.0's approval for release, I think this would be a good time to
have a discussion around the proposed versioned documentation site, powered
by Hugo. The site is ready to be released and the source code for the site
can be found in the apache/iceberg-docs repository:
https://
Hi Zaicheng, I cannot see your pictures, maybe we could discuss in Slack.
The goal here is to have a monotonically increasing number that could be
used to detect what files have been newly added and should be indexed. This
is especially important to know how up-to-date an index is for each
partiti
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:26 PM Walaa Eldin Moustafa
wrote:
> *2. Iceberg schema lower casing:* Before Iceberg, when users read Hive
> tables from Spark, the returned schema is lowercase since Hive stores all
> metadata in lowercase mode. If users move to Iceberg, such readers could
> break once
Hi everyone, bumping up this thread. Does it help to discuss each feature
individually?
I am guessing (4. Default value support) is straightforward since it is on
the roadmap already. If not, let us start with this.
As for the next step, it would be great if we can focus on (1. Reading
tables wit
Thanks to everyone who participated in the vote for Release Apache Iceberg
0.13.0 RC2.
The vote result is:
+1: 4 (binding), 7 (non-binding)
+0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)
-1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)
Therefore, the release candidate is passed.
Cheers,
Jack Ye
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:07
+1 (binding)
* checked signature, checksum
* Ran unit test, AWS integration test
* Tested basic table operations and RewriteDataFiles on AWS EMR Spark 3.0
and 3.1 environments
Best,
Jack Ye
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 1:52 PM Ryan Blue wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * Checked signature, checksums, ran
+1 (binding)
* Checked signature, checksums, ran RAT
* Ran tests
* Tested Spark 3.2 CREATE, INSERT, and INSERT OVERWRITE (same table)
* Tested merge-on-read with v1 table
* Tested update to v2
* Tested DELETE FROM with merge-on-read
* Tested rewrite_data_files to merge deletes
* Tested adding a pa
+1 non-binding
All tests passed
Signature OK
Checksum OK
License OK
Cheers,
Armin
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 12:54 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> 1. Verify the signature, checksum
> 2. All tests passed.
>
> Best,
>
> Yufei
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 9:45 AM Daniel Weeks wrote:
>
>>
+1 non-binding
1. Verify the signature, checksum
2. All tests passed.
Best,
Yufei
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 9:45 AM Daniel Weeks wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/tests.
>
> I ran some basic tests using spark 3.2 with the new runtime and everything
> worked as expected
+1 (binding)
Verified sigs/sums/license/build/tests.
I ran some basic tests using spark 3.2 with the new runtime and everything
worked as expected.
-Dan
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 5:53 PM Kyle Bendickson
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified signature, checksum, rat check, build and ran tests,
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified signature, checksum and rat check.
- Built and ran tests for all spark versions.
- Built spark-3.2 runtime jar and tested with spark-3.2. Tests included.
- basic smoke tests on create table, insert and drop table.
- custom location provider
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
