Sounds good to me.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:58 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
> I'd like to get 0.9.0 out as soon as possible. I expect to get an early RC
> out next week, once we have more tests committed. That way, people can
> start trying it out and reporting back where it doesn't work.
>
> I
Hi Chen,
Iceberg's API requires that the caller divides data correctly into files
according to the partition spec. Most of the time, users interact with
Iceberg using a processing engine like Spark or Presto that will do it for
you. If you're using the API directly, then you'll need to ensure you
Thanks for the suggestion, Jingsong. I think it sounds like a good idea to
link related pull requests and issues. We should all try to do that, and
thank you for the link describing how to do it in GitHub.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:51 PM Jingsong Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I look at the issues, it
I'd like to get 0.9.0 out as soon as possible. I expect to get an early RC
out next week, once we have more tests committed. That way, people can
start trying it out and reporting back where it doesn't work.
I'd rather not block 0.9.0 to wait on Flink connector components. There's
still a lot of w
I have a question on how hidden partitioning works in Iceberg using Java
API.
The code is something like the following.
```
// records is the list of records with a time column
// table is created using partition spec hour(time)
// records have different rows with different hours
Table table = lo
