Yeah, I totally forgot to record our discussion. Will do so next time,
sorry.
--
Jacques Nadeau
CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 4:24 PM Ryan Blue wrote:
> It wasn't recorded, but I can summarize what we talked about. Sorry I
> haven't sent this out earlier.
>
> We talked abou
It wasn't recorded, but I can summarize what we talked about. Sorry I
haven't sent this out earlier.
We talked about the options and some of the background in Iceberg --
basically that it isn't possible to determine the order of commits before
you commit so you can't rely on some monotonically inc
Hi Ryan,
I couldn't attend the meeting. Just curious, if this is recorded by any
chance.
Regards
Venkata krishnan
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:49 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
> Yes, I agree. I'll talk a little about a couple of the constraints of this
> as well.
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:52 AM Anton
Am I correct that performance is the main reason to have a custom reader in
Iceberg? Are there any other purposes? A common question I get is why not
improve parquet-mr instead of writing a new reader? I know that almost
every system that cares about performance has its own reader, but why so?
Per
