I made the following comment on the PR, but will include it here as well.
> Looks reasonable and points to the important detail. I would only add that if
> the podling is releasing with DISCLAIMER-WIP that the linked DISCLAIMER
> should be the DISCLAIMER-WIP with that added information.
Best,
D
OK. My major intention is to sync the discussion to the list. If "lazy
consensus" is too eager to use, I'm OK to make it clear that it's still
encouraged for everyone on the list to give more inputs :D
Best,
tison.
sebb 于2024年5月25日周六 16:26写道：
> On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 09:10, tison wrote:
> >
>
On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 09:10, tison wrote:
>
> A lazy consensus is met at [1].
Sorry, but I don't think it is correct to to use that designation here.
I don't think the discussion has been open long enough to say that
consensus has been achieved, nor was there an explicit call for
opinions.
All
A lazy consensus is met at [1]. I support Justin's opinion that "we were
not too prescriptive on the exact wording". But this patch can be used as a
reference for a good starting point for other podlings.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/incubator-horaedb/pull/1535#issuecomment-2130634831
Best,
tiso
