Re: Move to JDK-11

2025-04-12 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Moving to a newer JDK is a major milestone for the project and I am really thankful to everyone pushing this effort forward. There are always small hurdles and delays when pushing a big project forward so no one should feel bad or apologize when things do not go exactly as planned. Most projects t

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-12 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Thanks everyone for the valuable feedback! I think we have consensus to drop contributor and reviewers name from the commit message. As of now we can start applying the new style. I can also try to find a place on the website to mention the new style. Just to avoid any confusion, I am not suggest

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing Default Table Format to Iceberg in Upcoming Releases

2025-04-12 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Iceberg gets a lot of traction and the integration with Hive becomes more and more mature so it makes sense to start the discussion about making it as the default choice. However, I feel that it may be a bit too soon to do the switch right now. Apart from performance numbers our Iceberg test cover

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing Default Table Format to Iceberg in Upcoming Releases

2025-04-12 Thread Sungwoo Park
Hi, In my opinion, another major issue to address before switching to Iceberg as the default is Iceberg catalog support, e.g.: HIVE-28658: Iceberg REST Catalog Support HIVE-28879: Federated Catalog support My guess is that potential new users would be quite surprised to find no support for the I

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing Default Table Format to Iceberg in Upcoming Releases

2025-04-12 Thread Denys Kuzmenko
Thanks Sungwoo, Regarding performance testing, am I correct to assume that the "original" Hive table is an external one? Since Iceberg supports deletes, it might be worth comparing it against Hive ACID. We could generate 10-20% of the updates and measure the read performance overhead. Additi