Hi All,
I’d like to initiate a discussion around changing the default table
format to Iceberg in the upcoming releases.
Since we began development, Hive-Iceberg integration has matured
significantly. Given the increasing market traction and growing user
interest, I believe it might be the right t
Hi,
I strongly support this proposal. Hive would be one of the first engines
globally to make a clear and public commitment to Apache Iceberg, which is
a significant and forward-looking step. From my perspective, the majority
of recent development efforts have been focused on Iceberg, and it makes
Hi Okumin,
I know I'm one of the people responsible for misjudging the timeline around
the JDK-17 upgrade, which has ultimately blocked the 4.1.0 release. I want
to take a moment to share my thoughts and where things currently stand.
Q: Can we confirm the importance and ETA of the JDK upgrade and
Hi Ayush,
Thanks for initiating the interesting discussion.
In my personal opinion, it is likely a good idea. Apache Iceberg is
competitive and open. I can't immediately mention significant
drawbacks when users use Iceberg tables instead.
As a community member, I'm interested in data and facts t
Hi Ayush and all people working on the JDK upgrade,
Thanks for sharing the timeline and detailing the current progress. I'm
more than happy to hear the good news and look forward to seeing Hive
running on Java 17!
Mid-May is not so far away. I don't have a firm preference about how to
package 4.1
