Re: Review Request: HIVE-1734. Implement map_keys() and map_values() UDFs

2011-08-07 Thread Amareshwari Sriramadasu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1082/#review1316 --- Ship it! Will commit once tests pass. - Amareshwari On 2011-08-05

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-1734) Implement map_keys() and map_values() UDFs

2011-08-07 Thread jirapos...@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13080591#comment-13080591 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HIVE-1734: - ---

resend: Is a collocated join (a-la-netezza) theoretically possible in hive?

2011-08-07 Thread Ido Hadanny
When you join tables which are distributed on the same key and used these key columns in the join condition, then each SPU (machine) in netezza works 100% independent of the other (see nz-interview ). In hive, there's bucket

Re: resend: Is a collocated join (a-la-netezza) theoretically possible in hive?

2011-08-07 Thread Edward Capriolo
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Ido Hadanny wrote: > When you join tables which are distributed on the same key and used these > key columns in the join condition, then each SPU (machine) in netezza works > 100% independent of the other (see > nz-interview< > http://www.folkstalk.com/2011/06/net

Build failed in Jenkins: Hive-trunk-h0.21 #878

2011-08-07 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- [...truncated 31813 lines...] [junit] OK [junit] PREHOOK: query: select count(1) as cnt from testhivedrivertable [junit] PREHOOK: type: DROPTABLE [junit] PREHOOK: Input: default@tes

[jira] [Updated] (HIVE-1734) Implement map_keys() and map_values() UDFs

2011-08-07 Thread Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu updated HIVE-1734: -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.8.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]

[jira] [Updated] (HIVE-2329) Not using map aggregation, fails to execute group-by after cluster-by with same key

2011-08-07 Thread Navis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Navis updated HIVE-2329: Attachment: HIVE-2329.2.patch > Not using map aggregation, fails to execute group-by after cluster-by with > same k

Review Request: HIVE-2329 RS dedup optimization shoud be avoided in some cases

2011-08-07 Thread Navis Ryu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1313/ --- Review request for hive. Summary --- If map aggregation is set to false, DI

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-2329) Not using map aggregation, fails to execute group-by after cluster-by with same key

2011-08-07 Thread jirapos...@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13080779#comment-13080779 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HIVE-2329: - ---