Ok, Apache Infra has promised to get us resolved in the next 24 hours.
.. Owen
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Sergey Shelukhin > wrote:
>
>> Is there any update on this?
>
>
> Ok, after a thread that is more than 60 messages long,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Sergey Shelukhin
wrote:
> Is there any update on this?
Ok, after a thread that is more than 60 messages long, it looks like we get
to:
* Create a tag at the current head of master such as master_2015_11_24 to
record the current state of the master branch.
* Do
Is there any update on this?
On 15/11/20, 14:36, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
>I just sent off my message to board@apache with our ask. I'll keep you
>informed as to the outcome.
>
>.. Owen
>
>On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
>> Ok, I just talked to them over on the Infra hipch
I just sent off my message to board@apache with our ask. I'll keep you
informed as to the outcome.
.. Owen
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Ok, I just talked to them over on the Infra hipchat and Sam Ruby suggested
> that I take it to the board to get permission to replac
Ok, I just talked to them over on the Infra hipchat and Sam Ruby suggested
that I take it to the board to get permission to replace our master branch.
.. Owen
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> I've been maintaining the master-fixed branch, but I missed the fact that
> infr
I've been maintaining the master-fixed branch, but I missed the fact that
infra asked us to try pushing it ourself. Let me try that.
.. Owen
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Jimmy Xiang wrote:
> I can get the latest of master branch, clean it up, and force-push to
> master-fixed again.
>
> Ano
I can get the latest of master branch, clean it up, and force-push to
master-fixed again.
Another solution is to abandon branch master, then use a new branch like
"trunk".
Thanks,
Jimmy
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Sergey Shelukhin
wrote:
> Did this ever go anywhere?
> Infra told us to tr
Did this ever go anywhere?
Infra told us to try ourselves.
I wonder if we should do it before releasing 2.0...
I am assuming master-fixed diverged by now. It can be rebased as follows:
git rebase --onto master-fixed `git log master --grep="$(git show -s
master-fixed --format="%s")" --format="%H"
Ok, I've filled the infra jira for replacing the master branch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10731
.. Owen
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Jimmy Xiang wrote:
> Done. Branch master-fixed is clean now. What should we do next?
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Jimmy Xiang wrote
Done. Branch master-fixed is clean now. What should we do next?
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Jimmy Xiang wrote:
> Let me do that.
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
>> Can someone push a fixed master history to "master-fixed"? Then we can
>> start a discussion with in
Let me do that.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Can someone push a fixed master history to "master-fixed"? Then we can
> start a discussion with infra about replacing master with master-fixed.
>
> .. Owen
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Jimmy Xiang wrote:
>
> > Right.
Can someone push a fixed master history to "master-fixed"? Then we can
start a discussion with infra about replacing master with master-fixed.
.. Owen
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Jimmy Xiang wrote:
> Right. The file is not in source control any more. But it was there at some
> moment. That'
Right. The file is not in source control any more. But it was there at some
moment. That's why it is in the git history. So we need to clean up the git
history.
To push to a branch other than master, for example, hive-11890, as a
work-around, you can try https://rtyley.github.io/bfg-repo-cleaner/
I ran into the same problem too. What we need to do is to clean up the git
history. However, the master branch can't be force-pushed. I was wondering
if this is something the infra team can help.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Xuefu Zhang wrote:
> I don't quite follow. That file is not in sourc
I don't quite follow. That file is not in source control, but only
downloaded when running test. Why a git push will mass with that file?
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Github apparently has a limit on pushes to personal accounts that no file
> may be larger than 100mb.
15 matches
Mail list logo
