I've got all tests passing on this.
Are there other questions?
Is anyone willing to +1 ?
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 12:28 PM David Mollitor wrote:
> Hey Zoltan,
>
> Thanks for the feedback and for sharing HIVE-16496.
>
> I think HIVE-16496 is a better approach because it allows for the sta
Hey Zoltan,
Thanks for the feedback and for sharing HIVE-16496.
I think HIVE-16496 is a better approach because it allows for the standard
SQL behavior of object identifiers, but the SQL syntax is expanded (instead
of overloaded) to provide this feature.
Also, if a user would like to do some sor
Hey,
I don't want to protect this feature - but I think it could be usefull; probably it would be ok to remove it but we should provide something else instead - I think this is
the only way to "exclude" some specific columns from the output - without listing all the columns.
How much are users
