Re: Merge vectorization branch to trunk

2013-09-09 Thread Carl Steinbach
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > Can we vote to change the by-laws and then svn merge the branch? Seems > better then making a big patch and losing the commit history. Yes, we can do that, but amending the bylaws requires a 2/3 majority vote from active PMC members and a

Re: Merge vectorization branch to trunk

2013-09-09 Thread Edward Capriolo
Can we vote to change the by-laws and then svn merge the branch? Seems better then making a big patch and losing the commit history. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > > First of all I'd like to say thanks for your hard work! I also agree > > that this should go in post 0.1

Re: Merge vectorization branch to trunk

2013-09-09 Thread Carl Steinbach
> First of all I'd like to say thanks for your hard work! I also agree > that this should go in post 0.12 branch. > Ditto. As far as merging this into trunk goes, we're currently hamstrung by the fact that the Hive Bylaws don't include any provisions covering development work done on feature bra

Re: Merge vectorization branch to trunk

2013-09-09 Thread Jitendra Pandey
Hi Brock, I will merge latest trunk to the branch and run all the tests again, and provide you the run time difference. Trunk has moved ahead since the last merge, therefore test results are a bit stale right now. > What new modules or dependencies are added? No new dependencies have been add

Re: Merge vectorization branch to trunk

2013-09-06 Thread Brock Noland
Hi, First of all I'd like to say thanks for your hard work! I also agree that this should go in post 0.12 branch. I have a couple questions: Do all the tests pass? How long does ant test test take in comparison with trunk? What new modules or dependencies are added? Can the feature be disabled