I have got requests from multiple people for inclusion some
non-blocker jiras in 0.12, and some of them that I got around friday
are in the review phase. So I am planning to extending the time for
inclusion of any on non-blocker jiras by another 2-3 days. I am hoping
to get the patches for any bloc
I think a small waiting period (around 2 weeks) after branch is cut is
good, so that we reduce the volume of changes and there is time to
pull in any important bug fixes that are found.
Yes, I think it is time to review the blockers and any jiras that
should be marked as blockers.
On Sat, Aug 31,
The error reported on the list a few days ago with streaming not working
properly when grouping on multiple columns should also probably qualify as
a blocker since streaming is a key feature of hive.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> I do not think we should consider too
I do not think we should consider too many not done items for 12.0. I do
not think releases should be a wish-list. If trunk is working with no
blockers we should build a release, anything not done and not committed
goes in next release. I do not like cherry picking issues and then waiting
for them.
Because this change includes moving/renaming 300 files and then adding
about 200 more with the same name (but contents from 0.11 branch) as the
file had before the move. The first part is necessary to change the
package name, the second to ensure backwards compatibility. I described
this in detai
Hi Jason,
I assume the 0.12 branch creation does not have to wait for this, and you
just want it to be included in the release.
Thanks,
Thejas
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Jason Dere wrote:
> Would like to see HIVE-4844 make it in if possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> On Aug 29, 2013, at 10
Hi Eugene,
Can you please elaborate on why you would like to have this in before
branching and not commit it after branching in trunk and the branch ?
Thanks,
Thejas
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Eugene Koifman
wrote:
> I think we should make sure that several items under HIVE-4869 get chec
Would like to see HIVE-4844 make it in if possible.
Thanks,
Jason
On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Eugene Koifman wrote:
> I think we should make sure that several items under HIVE-4869 get checked
> in before branching.
>
> Eugene
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Thejas Nair wrote:
>
>
I think we should make sure that several items under HIVE-4869 get checked
in before branching.
Eugene
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Thejas Nair wrote:
> It has been more than 3 months since 0.11 was released and we already have
> 294 jiras in resolved-fixed state for 0.12. This includes se
