Miklos Gergely created HIVE-19400:
-
Summary: Adjust Hive 1.0 to 2.0 conversion utility to the upgrade
Key: HIVE-19400
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19400
Project: Hive
Hernan Vivani created HIVE-15106:
Summary: Hive 1.0 returning only date part of a timestamp
Key: HIVE-15106
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15106
Project: Hive
Issue Type
1.2 today. There is no such
issues. In this case, I think the issue is because of the environment I used
previously.
The issues happens when I have multiple version of Hive running in the same
clusters (v1.0 and v.0.13.0). Troubleshooting can start from this step.
> Create Index failed in H
No, there's no such way. You need to rebuild the project from source after
applying the patch.
Please checkout
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute for more
details.
Chao
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Srinivas Thunga
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> is there any way that w
No, HIVE-9481 is not yet committed to trunk. It should be released in 1.2.
Alan.
Srinivas Thunga <mailto:srinivas.thu...@gmail.com>
February 12, 2015 at 3:28
Hi Team,
In hive 1.0, hive-9481 patch is updated ?
because i have installed hive 1.0
And tried selected columns to insert
Hi Team,
is there any way that we can run the patch directly on Hive instead of
source.
As i am using hive-0.14 - bin.
So i need to apply the patch directly in hive to get reflect and support
for select columns for insert
*Thanks & Regards,*
*Srinivas T*
Hi Team,
In hive 1.0, hive-9481 patch is updated ?
because i have installed hive 1.0
And tried selected columns to insert
insert into table target (y,z) select * from source
I am getting error like
ParseException line 1:25 cannot recognize input near '(' 'y' ')'
y to reproduce in Hive 1.0
> Create Index failed in Hive 1.0
> ---
>
> Key: HIVE-9639
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9639
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
>
race?
> Create Index failed in Hive 1.0
> ---
>
> Key: HIVE-9639
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9639
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Indexing, Parser
D;
FAILED: Execution Error, return code 1 from
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.DDLTask. Table not found
default__employee_id_idx_id_employee_id__
> Create Index failed in Hive 1.0
> ---
>
> Key: HIVE-9639
> URL: https://issu
Will Du created HIVE-9639:
-
Summary: Create Index failed in Hive 1.0
Key: HIVE-9639
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9639
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Indexing
ge
> > > - Verified RELEASE_NOTES.txt, checked LICENSE,NOTICE, README.txt
> > > - used schematool to upgrade metastore from hive 0.13.0 to 1.0.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
in.tar.gz and newly built package
> > - Verified RELEASE_NOTES.txt, checked LICENSE,NOTICE, README.txt
> > - used schematool to upgrade metastore from hive 0.13.0 to 1.0.0
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Vikram Dixit K
from source tar.gz
> - ran simple queries from both bin.tar.gz and newly built package
> - Verified RELEASE_NOTES.txt, checked LICENSE,NOTICE, README.txt
> - used schematool to upgrade metastore from hive 0.13.0 to 1.0.0
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Vikra
PM, Vikram Dixit K wrote:
> Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 2 is available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~vikram/hive/apache-hive-1.0.0-rc2/
>
> Maven artifacts are available here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-1021/
>
> Source tag
+1, again. :) Checked the keys and hash, built it with a fresh maven repo.
Alan.
On 1/29/15, 17:05, "Vikram Dixit K" wrote:
>Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 2 is available here:
>http://cp.mcafee.com/d/2DRPow82gwrhojjvuLtYsrKrhKUZtZxBBwS
e:
>
> > +1. Downloaded it, checked out the signatures, did a build, checked
> there
> > were no snapshot dependencies.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > Vikram Dixit K
> > January 27, 2015 at 14:28
> > Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 1 is available h
ded it, checked out the signatures, did a build, checked there
> were no snapshot dependencies.
>
> Alan.
>
> Vikram Dixit K<mailto:vikram.di...@gmail.com>
> January 27, 2015 at 14:28
> Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 1 is available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~vikr
Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 2 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~vikram/hive/apache-hive-1.0.0-rc2/
Maven artifacts are available here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-1021/
Source tag for RC1 is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hive/tags
apshot dependencies.
Alan.
Vikram Dixit K<mailto:vikram.di...@gmail.com>
January 27, 2015 at 14:28
Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 1 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~vikram/hive/apache-hive-1.0-rc1/<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/5
in 1.0 branch now.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
> +1. Downloaded it, checked out the signatures, did a build, checked there
> were no snapshot dependencies.
>
> Alan.
>
> Vikram Dixit K
> January 27, 2015 at 14:28
> Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candi
+1. Downloaded it, checked out the signatures, did a build, checked
there were no snapshot dependencies.
Alan.
Vikram Dixit K <mailto:vikram.di...@gmail.com>
January 27, 2015 at 14:28
Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 1 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~vikram/hive/apache-hi
re: Can webhcat-default.xml be updated?
This doesn't feel like a blocker to me, though we should probably fix it if
we have a new rc?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Chao Sun wrote:
> - Checked RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE, README.txt. The copy right in the NOTICE
> file needs to be updated to "2008-
"0.11.0" in the defaults for
> > templeton.hive.path and templeton.pig.path (HIVE-8807
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8807>) there are
> > "0.14.0-SNAPSHOT" values for templeton.hive.home and templeton.hcat.home.
> >
> &g
are
> "0.14.0-SNAPSHOT" values for templeton.hive.home and templeton.hcat.home.
>
> -- Lefty
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Vikram Dixit K
> wrote:
>
> > Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 1 is available here:
> > http://people.
y
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Vikram Dixit K
wrote:
> Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 1 is available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~vikram/hive/apache-hive-1.0-rc1/
>
> Maven artifacts are available here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-1
Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 1 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~vikram/hive/apache-hive-1.0-rc1/
Maven artifacts are available here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-1020/
Source tag for RC1 is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hive/branches
It looks like I missed updating the release notes with the latest changes
that have gone into 1.0. I will fix that and create a new RC.
Thanks
Vikram.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Vikram Dixit K
wrote:
> Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 0 is available here:
> http://people.apac
Apache Hive 1.0 Release Candidate 0 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~vikram/hive/apache-hive-1.0-rc0/
Maven artifacts are available here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-1019/
Source tag for RC0 is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hive/branches
Hi Olga,
> Switching everybody to HiveServer2 has performance and scale consequences
> that might not be acceptable for every use case.
>
Just wanted to make sure you're aware that it's possible to run HiveServer2
in a thick-client mode where it sits embedded in the client JVM process.
This allo
ask to decouple Hive 1.0 discussion from removing CLI.
Thanks,
Olga
-Original Message-
From: Thejas Nair [mailto:the...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 12:59 PM
To: dev@hive.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Hive 1.0 ?
I don't know for sure if beeline has fi
; I'd like to see HiveCLI, HiveServer, and the original JDBC driver
> >> > deprecated and purged from the codebase before the 1.0 release. This
> >> topic
> >> > probably needs its own thread, but I thought I should mention it here.
> >> >
> >> > Thank
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I am the RM for HBase-1.0 coming in a a couple of weeks (hopefully). I
>> >> think both HBase and Hive are past due for doing 1.0 releases. So I am a
>> >
release. This
> topic
> > probably needs its own thread, but I thought I should mention it here.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > - Carl
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am the RM fo
ought I should mention it here.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Carl
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am the RM for HBase-1.0 coming in a a couple of weeks (hopefully). I
>> think both HBase and Hive are past due for doing 1.0 r
, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the RM for HBase-1.0 coming in a a couple of weeks (hopefully). I
> think both HBase and Hive are past due for doing 1.0 releases. So I am a
> major +1 for Hive-1.0 (non-binding of course).
>
> The important thing
i,
>
> I am the RM for HBase-1.0 coming in a a couple of weeks (hopefully). I
> think both HBase and Hive are past due for doing 1.0 releases. So I am a
> major +1 for Hive-1.0 (non-binding of course).
>
> The important thing for calling something 1.0 I think is the focus on user
>
I think 1.0 release in particular should be a relatively stable release,
since we go from "beta"(?) stage of 0.x to 1.0.
Otherwise, what prevents us from promoting 0.14 to 1.0? 0.14.1 is not done
yet, so it would be great, we will have no 0.x.y releases, and 1.1 will
become the first fix release, n
| Advanced Analytics | Big Data | ECI| EPM | MDM
-Original Message-
From: Enis Söztutar [mailto:e...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 5:27 PM
To: dev@hive.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Hive 1.0 ?
Hi,
I am the RM for HBase-1.0 coming in a a couple of weeks (hopefully). I
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the RM for HBase-1.0 coming in a a couple of weeks (hopefully). I
> think both HBase and Hive are past due for doing 1.0 releases. So I am a
> major +1 for Hive-1.0 (non-binding of course).
>
Agreed :)
>
Hi,
I am the RM for HBase-1.0 coming in a a couple of weeks (hopefully). I
think both HBase and Hive are past due for doing 1.0 releases. So I am a
major +1 for Hive-1.0 (non-binding of course).
The important thing for calling something 1.0 I think is the focus on user
level API and
Would everyone just laugh if I suggested that a 1.0 release ought to
include complete documentation?
-- Lefty
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Thejas Nair wrote:
> The reasons for confusion in the Hadoop case were different. There
> were many branches, and new features were added in minor versi
The reasons for confusion in the Hadoop case were different. There
were many branches, and new features were added in minor version
releases, eg kerberos security was not there in "0.20.2", but it was
added in "0.20.20x". Then you had other versions like "0.21", but the
older "0.20.20x" version wa
Major release means more functionality, while minor releases provides
stability. Therefore, I'd think, 1.0, as a major release, should bring in
something new to the user. If it's desirable to provide more stable
release, then 0.14.1, 0.14.2, and so on are the right ones. In my opinion,
we should av
I think it's better to do 1.0 release off a maintenance release, since that
is more stable. Trunk is moving fast.
HBase uses odd release numbers for this purpose, where 0.95, 97, 99 etc.
are dev releases and 0.96, 0.98, 1.0 etc. are public; that works well for
baking, but since we don't have that s
Hi Thejas,
Thank you very much for your proposal!
Hadoop did something similar renaming branches to branch-1 and
branch-2. At the time, although I was very much in favor of the new
release numbers, I thought it could have been handled better. Renaming
release branches ended up being very confusin
Apache Hive is the de facto SQL query engine in the hadoop ecosystem.
I believe it is also the most widely used one as well. Hive is used in
production in large number of enterprises.
However, this 0.x.y versioning that we have been using for Hive
obscures this status of Hive.
I propose creating a
47 matches
Mail list logo
