Re: [DISCUSS] Hive and HBase dependency

Yeah. I don't think HBase 1.0 vs 1.1 should really make a difference. Just issues like [1] had me concerned that something within the existing codebase might not work really well with 1.0. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10990 On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Alan Gates wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Hive and HBase dependency

My hope is to have it ready to merge into master soon (like in a few weeks). I don't think it will affect anything in the hive hbase integration other than we need to make sure we can work with the same version of hbase. If we needed to move back to HBase 1.0 for that I think that would be ok.

Re: [DISCUSS] Hive and HBase dependency

Thanks Alan. I created [1] to revert the non-passive changes from 1.x. Out of curiosity, what are your plans on merging the metastore branch to master? It seems like some coordination might be needed as some of the stuff in the hive hbase integration might need some massaging before that is done.

Re: [DISCUSS] Hive and HBase dependency

On the hbase-metastore branch I've actually already moved to HBase 1.1. I'm +1 for moving to 1.1 or 1.0 on master and staying at 0.98 on branch-1. Alan. kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com August 12, 2015 at 8:43 Hi all, It seems like our current dependency on HBas

[DISCUSS] Hive and HBase dependency

Hi all, It seems like our current dependency on HBase is a little fuzzy to say the least. And with increased features relying on HBase(HBase integration, HBase metastore etc), I think it would be worth giving a thought into how we want to manage this dependency. I have also seen regressions[1][2]