Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-12 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Thanks everyone for the valuable feedback! I think we have consensus to drop contributor and reviewers name from the commit message. As of now we can start applying the new style. I can also try to find a place on the website to mention the new style. Just to avoid any confusion, I am not suggest

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-10 Thread Butao Zhang
IMO, It is enough to mention&thank the contributor & reviewers in the Github page. For the Jira page, it's sufficient to express gratitude to the author only. There is no need to mention the reviewer. Because it can be rather troublesome to look up the Jira account of the reviewer sometimes & a

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-10 Thread Okumin
+1 I also confirmed that we have followed the practice since at least 2015 before we moved to GitHub, so it is likely to have purposes other than incentives. Also, no one, including me, has proven it could be a strong incentive. I second the idea of improving the current real process. Regarding B

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-09 Thread Butao Zhang
+1 BTW, Should we also ignore mentioning the contributors and reviewers in the corresponding JIRA? And then directly just closed the JIRA? -Butao On 2025/04/08 16:22:33 Ayush Saxena wrote: > I feel that for some folks—especially those new to the project—seeing > their name in the commit message

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Ayush Saxena
I feel that for some folks—especially those new to the project—seeing their name in the commit message might serve as a small motivation to review more. The practice of including the author name I believe has been around since the SVN days or the patch days, or even earlier, when committers used to

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Shohei Okumiya
+1 for the author part. Regarding the reviewers' names, I have one thouht from a bit diffrent angle. The number of reviewers is always the biggest bottleneck. If the small praize motivates people and they try one more review, it is meaningful. But I don't have any evidence about how many people fe

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Zsolt Miskolczi
+1. I don't see the value in that. Attila Turoczy ezt írta (időpont: 2025. ápr. 8., K, 16:32): > +1.It's a thoughtful gesture for reviewers, but if it creates headaches > for the dev's and adds unnecessary steps, I think we can live without it. > > -Attila > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 4:27 PM Sta

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Attila Turoczy
+1.It's a thoughtful gesture for reviewers, but if it creates headaches for the dev's and adds unnecessary steps, I think we can live without it. -Attila On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 4:27 PM Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > Hi all, > > How do you feel about dropping the contributor and reviewer names fro

[DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Hi all, How do you feel about dropping the contributor and reviewer names from the commit summary? Before: HIVE-28884: Decouple source.q test from SRC dataset (Stamatis Zampetakis reviewed by Soumyakanti Das, Zsolt Miskolczi, Shohei Okumiya, Simhadri Govindappa) After: HIVE-28884: Decouple sour