Re: Proposal: Revamp Apache Hive website.

I had a PR to replace the website with markdown. Apache Infra was supposed to make it autopublish. *sigh* .. Owen On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 4:23 PM Pau Tallada wrote: > Hi, > > Great work! > +1 on updating it as well > > Missatge de Ayush Saxena del dia dj., 15 de set. > 2022 a les 17:40: > >> H

FYI: MetaStore running out of threads

We're using HMS with Storage-Based Authorization and have been having trouble with the HMS running out of threads. Looking at the jstack & code, it appears to that the problem is that RPC's ConnectionId is using UGI's equal/hash, which uses the Subject's Object equals/hash. Proxy user UGI's always

Re: Should we consider Spark3 support for Hive on Spark

Hive on Spark is not recommended. The recommended path is to use either Tez or LLAP. If you already are using Spark 3, it would be far easier to use Spark SQL. .. Owen On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:46 AM Fred Bai wrote: > Hi everyone: > > Do we have any support for Hive on Spark? I need Hive on Spa

[RESULT][VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.1 rc2?

n > > > > > On Aug 2, 2021, at 4:09 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > > > > > > +1. Built it, ran rat, checked the signature and the hash. > > > > > > Alan. > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 3:13 PM Owen O'Malley > > > wrote

[RESULT][VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.3-rc2?

With four +1's (3 binding) and no -1's the vote passes. I'll finalize the release and then backport HIVE-23617 on to the release branch. Thanks all for voting, Owen On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:31 PM Owen O'Malley wrote: > Alright, I tracked this down to the default

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.3-rc2?

wrote: > Centos, java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel > > Alan. > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:20 PM Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > Ok, I was able to reproduce it in ORC's Ubuntu 18 docker image. I'll > track > > it down. > > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.3-rc2?

Ok, I was able to reproduce it in ORC's Ubuntu 18 docker image. I'll track it down. On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:06 AM Owen O'Malley wrote: > Hmm, I just reran the build both from git and the tar ball and > TestBytesColumnVector passed both times. Which jvm were you using? &g

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.3-rc2?

> > tests. Ran rat. I did get one failing test, but it doesn't look > crucial: > > > > TestBytesColumnVector.testConcatAndPadding:109 row 0 expected:<[?]> but > > was:<[???]> > > > > Alan. > > > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 3:14 PM

[VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.3-rc2?

Hello all, Following on previous discussions, I would like to propose a new storage-api release including HIVE-25400. Shall we release the following artifacts as Hive Storage API 2.7.3? tar: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/hive-storage-2.7.3/ tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/stor

[VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.1 rc2?

Hello all, I would like to propose a new storage-api release including HIVE-25400. Shall we release the following artifacts as Hive Storage API 2.8.1? tar: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/hive-storage-2.8.1/ tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/storage-release-2.8.1-rc2 jiras: https:

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.1 rc1?

https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/2543 .. Owen > On Jul 28, 2021, at 09:33, Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > Thank you for sharing. What is the JIRA ID for redact issue? > > Dongjoon > >> On 2021/07/28 16:22:03, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Ok, pavan found that hi

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-25400) Move the offset updating in BytesColumnVector to setValPreallocated.

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-25400: Summary: Move the offset updating in BytesColumnVector to setValPreallocated. Key: HIVE-25400 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-25400 Project:

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.1 rc1?

Ok, pavan found that hive 25190 broke the redact mask code in orc. Let me fix that. .. Owen > On Jul 26, 2021, at 14:18, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >  > Hello all, > > I would like to propose a new storage-api release including HIVE-25386 and > HIVE-25190. > >

[VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.3-rc1?

Hello all, Following on previous discussions, I would like to propose a new storage-api release including HIVE-25190. Shall we release the following artifacts as Hive Storage API 2.7.3? tar: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/hive-storage-2.7.3/ tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/stor

[VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.1 rc1?

Hello all, I would like to propose a new storage-api release including HIVE-25386 and HIVE-25190. Shall we release the following artifacts as Hive Storage API 2.8.1? tar: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/hive-storage-2.8.1/ tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/storage-release-2.8.1-rc

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

; > stage. > > > > https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/773 > > > > For now, I filed a JIRA issue and made a PR. Please comment your opinion > > on the Hive and ORC PRs. > > - HIVE-25386: hive-storage-api should not have guava compile dependency > &g

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

lease fix the "Fix version" of the JIRA when you get a chance. > > Thanks. > > > > Best, > > Chao > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:29 PM Owen O'Malley > > wrote: > > > >> Chao, > >>Panos key d

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

ul 21, 2021 at 9:10 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > * Built module > > * Ran tests > > * Checked artifact checksum and signature > > > > Thanks > > Szehon > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 2:11 PM Owen O'Malley > >

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

30 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > > +1 > > > > * Build and tested locally. > > > > Thanks, > > Dongjoon. > > > > On 2021/07/19 23:15:46, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > > +1 (binding): > > > * Built and tested > > > * Buil

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

+1 (binding): * Built and tested * Built hive main branch using it * Verified signatures and checksums It is too bad that we didn't get HIVE-25190 into it, but that can wait for 2.8.1. .. Owen On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:44 PM Pavan Lanka wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I have done the following:

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.3-rc0 ?

-1 (binding) Looking at the git history, you've cut a branch from hive's master to make a new release branch, but used the previous release's number (2.7). Since HIVE-24458 is a performance/new functionality it should probably be a new release. I'll rename the branch from storage-branch-2.7.3 to

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-25190) BytesColumnVector fails when the aggregate size is > 1gb

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-25190: Summary: BytesColumnVector fails when the aggregate size is > 1gb Key: HIVE-25190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-25190 Project: Hive

Review for SArg patch

All, I've had a patch out for review https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/1726 that is needed for an improvement for ORC predicate pushdown. It

Re: Upgrade ORC to 1.6

This is great news! Thank you for your hard work to make it happen. Getting ORC 1.6.7 released shouldn't be hard. .. Owen On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 5:00 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > Thank you, Panagiotis and Laszio. > > This is a big move forward in both Hive and Hive project. > > ORC community will

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-24458) Allow access to SArgs without converting to disjunctive normal form

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-24458: Summary: Allow access to SArgs without converting to disjunctive normal form Key: HIVE-24458 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24458 Project:

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-24455) Fix broken junit framework in storage-api

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-24455: Summary: Fix broken junit framework in storage-api Key: HIVE-24455 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24455 Project: Hive Issue Type

Re: Need privilege to create a new release version in Hive JIRA

I created the 2.3.8 release for you. It isn't clear which authorization is required to create a new release. .. Owen On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:20 PM Chao Sun wrote: > Hi all, > > As mentioned in a separate email, I'm preparing for the new 2.3.8 release. > However, currently in JIRA there is no

Re: Your project's website

ing the site...we will be able to change the site > more easily after this change > +1 merging it > > cheers, > Zoltan > > > On 8/26/20 5:52 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > Is there any more feedback or concerns on the proposed site? > > > > If not, I

Re: Your project's website

Is there any more feedback or concerns on the proposed site? If not, I'll go ahead and check it in and file the jira for Apache Infra to move the hosting for our site. .. Owen On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 2:05 PM Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, >I realized that I could mark my

Re: Your project's website

PMC statement that Infra can close > down the project presence on the CMS. > > Thanks! > > Andrew > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:09 AM Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >> All, >> >> I ported the current site to github pages and pushed it to >> https

Re: Your project's website

All, I ported the current site to github pages and pushed it to https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/1410 . Take a look. It will certainly be much easier to maintain. .. Owen On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 6:26 AM Andrew Wetmore wrote: > Hi: > > I wrote to you two weeks ago about your project websit

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.2-rc1?

Thanks, Jesus, Gopal, and Panos for driving this. .. Owen On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 7:41 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote: > With three +1s the release vote passes. > > Thanks Gopal and Ashutosh for voting. > > -Jesús > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 6:23 PM Ashutosh Chauhan > wrote: > > > +1 > > Than

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.3.7 Release Candidate 0

I'm +1 for the release. - I checked the signature & sha. - I built the project. - I ran a handful of unit tests. .. Owen On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:34 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > Thank you so much Alan for doing this. > > 2020년 4월 8일 (수) 오전 9:26, Alan Gates 님이 작성: > > > Apache Hive 2.3.7 R

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-23215) Make FilterContext and MutableFilterContext interfaces

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-23215: Summary: Make FilterContext and MutableFilterContext interfaces Key: HIVE-23215 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23215 Project: Hive

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.2-rc0?

Panos contribution are on > hold because of this. > > -Jesús > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:31 PM Ashutosh Chauhan > wrote: > > > +1 > > built and ran few tests locally. > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:21 PM Owen O'Malley > > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.2-rc0?

In evaluating this RC, I discovered HIVE-22959, which is the only patch in this RC. I'm uncomfortable with the API added by HIVE-22959, because it is duplicating a lot of the functionality from VectorizedRowBatch. I'll look at the motivating ORC-577 tomorrow, but for now I'm -1 on releasing it. .

[RESULT][VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.1rc0?

still says 2017. > > Alan. > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:57 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez < > jcama...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Downloaded tar, built storage-api and ran test suite, ran rat check, and >> verified checksum and signature.

[VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.1rc0?

All, I'd like to make a storage-api release with HIVE-22405 in it. Should we release the following artifacts as Hive Storage API 2.7.1? tar: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/storage-api-2.7.1/ tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/stora

Making a storage-api 2.7.1 release

All, I'd like to make a storage-api 2.7.1 release with HIVE-22405. Does anyone have any other patches that they'd like to include? Thanks, Owen

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-22405) Add ColumnVector support for ProlepticCalendar

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-22405: Summary: Add ColumnVector support for ProlepticCalendar Key: HIVE-22405 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22405 Project: Hive Issue Type

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 3.1.2 Release Candidate 1

+1 * checked source checksum & signature * built the code * ran some orc tests * ran rat .. Owen On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:06 AM Zoltan Haindrich wrote: > * deployed the binary in a single node environment (tez-0.9.1; > hadoop-3.1.1) > * run some simple queries > * checked signatures > * compi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.3.6 Release Candidate 0

Sorry, I forgot to include my +1. *grin* > On Aug 21, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > I checked the source artifacts: > The checksums are correct. > The build succeeds. > I ran some of the ORC tests. > RAT passes. > .. Owen > > On Wed, Aug 2

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.3.6 Release Candidate 0

I checked the source artifacts: 1. The checksums are correct. 2. The build succeeds. 3. I ran some of the ORC tests. 4. RAT passes. .. Owen On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:24 AM Zoltan Haindrich wrote: > +1 > * checked signatures > * downloaded the binary release; run some queries in a s

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-22105) Update ORC to 1.5.6.

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-22105: Summary: Update ORC to 1.5.6. Key: HIVE-22105 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22105 Project: Hive Issue Type: Bug Reporter:

Section 742.15 NOTIFICATION - Encryption

SUBMISSION TYPE: Section 742.15 SUBMITTED BY: Owen O'Malley SUBMITTED FOR:The Apache Software Foundation POINT OF CONTACT: Secretary, The Apache Software Foundation FAX: +1-919-573-9199 MANUFACTURER(S): The Apache Software Foundation PR

Export control

In registering ORC as using encryption, I realised that hive isn't listed, although it has used encryption since 1.3. Since I just ran through the process, unless someone objects, I'll do it for hive also. .. Owen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.3.5 Release Candidate 0

+1 For the source release: * check signatures of tarball * asked Alan to update the KEYS file with his current key * built code * ran a set of the unit tests .. Owen On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:57 PM Alan Gates wrote: > Apache Hive 2.3.5 Release Candidate 0 is available > here:http://people.apach

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-21585) Upgrade branch-2.3 to ORC 1.3.4

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-21585: Summary: Upgrade branch-2.3 to ORC 1.3.4 Key: HIVE-21585 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21585 Project: Hive Issue Type

Re: Force push of branch-2.3

Ok, I've done the force push to branch-2.3. I also added a commit (432960e9) that updated the versions in the poms from 2.3.4-SNAPSHOT to the now correct 2.3.5-SNAPSHOT. Thanks, Owen On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:38 AM Thejas Nair wrote: > +1 > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 9:45

Force push of branch-2.3

All, The branch-2.3 currently does not have either the rel/release-2.3.3 or rel/release-2.3.4 tag on it. There is only one commit after the 2.3.4 tag that back ports HIVE-20126. If no one objects, I’d like to force push branch-2.3 to include the 2.3.4 tag (with HIVE-20126 rebased on top). We

Re: Avoiding merge commits

I'm +1 for avoiding merge commits on master and release branches. .. Owen On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:47 AM Ashutosh Chauhan wrote: > Hi, > With advent of gitbox/github integration, folks have started using merge > commits (inadvertently I believe by merging via Github). This causes issues > dow

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent Timestamps across Hadoop

Toward that end, I've updated the Hive tutorial wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Tutorial with the current timestamp semantics. In the DDL section, we should call out the historical semantics and the former and current bugs. .. Owen

Fwd: [DISCUSS] Consistent Timestamps across Hadoop

-- Forwarded message - From: Owen O'Malley Date: Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:09 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent Timestamps across Hadoop To: Zoltan Ivanfi No, that isn't right. The discussion for Apache projects needs to happen in the open and not the private googl

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent Timestamps across Hadoop

timestamp types will have much better > interoperability and consistency across different Hadoop SQL engines. > > Thanks, > > Zoltan > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:54 PM Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >> Thank you for starting this discussion. Clearly the Hive

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent Timestamps across Hadoop

Thank you for starting this discussion. Clearly the Hive semantics on timestamp are very messed up, but has been moving in the right direction of becoming more SQL standard compliant. I'm pulling this discussion back to the list rather than the personal GoogleDoc, which isn't very collaborative. I

Re: [VOTE] Should we release storage-api 2.7.0 rc1?

.7.0-rc1 > Tar Ball : http://home.apache.org/~djaiswal/hive-storage-2.7.0/ > > Regards, > Deepak > > On 7/10/18, 10:16 AM, "Deepak Jaiswal" wrote: > > Thanks Owen for finding this out. I will work on the next RC once this > blocker is resolved. > > Rega

Re: [VOTE] Should we release storage-api 2.7.0 rc0?

Ok, Jesus and I tracked it down and I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20135 that is a blocker on storage-api 2.7.0. The impact was that orc 1.5 and master failed with the RC. orc 1.4 and older were fine. .. Owen On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Owen O'Malley w

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-20135) Fix incompatible change in TimestampColumnVector to default to UTC

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-20135: Summary: Fix incompatible change in TimestampColumnVector to default to UTC Key: HIVE-20135 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20135 Project:

Re: [VOTE] Should we release storage-api 2.7.0 rc0?

I wanted to give an update on this. For now, I'm -1 because the ORC (branch-1.5) tests fail with this RC. I'll dig into what is wrong, but it looks like something in the timezone changes broke backwards compatibility. .. Owen On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Deepak Jaiswal wrote: > Thanks Alan.

Re: Integrating HMS microbenchmarks with standalone metastore

I think that having benchmarks is a really good idea. You will need to make them a separate submodule of the standalone Metastore that isn't built by default, because we can't have a dependency on JMH, which is GPL licensed. .. Owen > On Jun 14, 2018, at 02:55, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: >

Re: Cleaning up old version in dist

The more accurate guidance is to keep the latest release from each branch that is being actively maintained. At this point, that means 2.3 and 3.0 for Hive. I'd propose that we keep those versions of storage-api that match those versions of Hive. That means we should keep 2.4 and 2.6 for storage ap

Re: Publishing Hive RC artifacts

You need to be a PMC member to commit to the dist directory, so you'll need to find someone to do it for you. .. Owen On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Vineet Garg wrote: > No I still haven’t figured it out. Wiki edit was for different reason. > > > On May 19, 2018, at 3:47 PM, Lefty Leverenz >

Re: [VOTE] Stricter commit guidelines

+1 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Peter Vary wrote: > +1 - Hoping for something like this for a long while! Thanks for taking > this up all! > > > On May 15, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez < > jcama...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Forgot to mention the length of the vote in original m

Re: [VOTE] Should we release storage-api 2.6.1 rc0?

Deepak, you need to let 72 hours go by. .. Owen On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Deepak Jaiswal wrote: > With 3 +1s and no -1s the vote passes. Thanks Owen and Jesus. > > Regards, > Deepak > > On 5/9/18, 9:49 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Should we release storage-api 2.6.1 rc0?

+1 checked signatures compiled and ran tests On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez < jcamachorodrig...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > +1 > - compiled from src > - ran unit tests > > -Jesús > > > On 5/9/18, 11:48 AM, "Deepak Jaiswal" wrote: > > Ping! > > On 5/8/18, 12:59 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-API 2.6.1 release

7, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Thanks, Deepak. > > The storage-api releases are global, not specific to a single branch. > Please delete the storage-branch-2.6.1 branch, the changes that you need > should go on the storage-branch-2.6. > > Please don'

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-API 2.6.1 release

Thanks, Deepak. The storage-api releases are global, not specific to a single branch. Please delete the storage-branch-2.6.1 branch, the changes that you need should go on the storage-branch-2.6. Please don't copy all of the patches from branch-3 into storage-branch-2.6. Just cherry-pick the ones

Re: Apache Hive 3.0.0 release preparation

*Sigh* It looks like branch-3 requires features in storage-api that were added after storage-api 2.6.0. You'll need to make another storage-api release or revert those changes. .. Owen On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Vihang Karajgaonkar wrote: > How do we handle the cases where a patch needs

Re: [VOTE] Should we release storage-api 2.6.0 rc0?

driguez < > jcama...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 > > - compiled from src > > - ran unit tests > > - ran rat > > > > -Jesús > > > > > > > > On 4/26/18, 8:30 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > > > All, > &g

[VOTE] Should we release storage-api 2.6.0 rc0?

All, I'd like to make a new release of the storage-api. Artifacts: tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/storage-release-2.6.0-rc0 tar ball: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/storage-2.6.0/ Thanks, Owen

[DISCUSS] Storage-API 2.6 release

All, For the 3.0 release we need a new version of Storage-API. I had hoped that there would only be bug fixes on top of the 2.5 release, but some new additions have gone in. I therefore propose that we cut a new storage-branch-2.6 from master and make a release. Are there any outstanding patch

hive dist area questions

Thejas, While uploading the new storage api 2.5.0 release into the dist area, I realized that we had some non-releases in there. Thejas aded "ldap-fix" in May 2015 and Sushanth added "hive-parent-auth-hook" in Jan 2016. Are they releases? Are they out of date? I also went through the dist are

[RESULT][VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.5.0 rc0?

With three +1’s and no -1’s the vote passes. Thanks Alan & Prasanth!

[VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.5.0 rc0?

All, I'd like to make a new release of the storage-api with some of the new features. Artifacts: tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/storage-release-2.5.0-rc0 tar ball: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/storage-2.5.0/ Thanks, Owen

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-19013) Fix some minor build issues in storage-api

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-19013: Summary: Fix some minor build issues in storage-api Key: HIVE-19013 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19013 Project: Hive Issue Type

storage-api 2.5 release

All, A couple of features like Decimal64 have gone in to storage-api and I'd like to make a release. Any thoughts? .. Owen

Re: Long running time for recently added tests in standalone-metastore

+1 On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > Quite reasonable. > +1 > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > > > With all of the added tests in standalone-metastore/…/client directory, > the > > runtime of ‘mvn test’ in standalone-metastore went from 6 minutes

Re: Proposal to create a branch for the standalone-metastore work

Alan, That sounds reasonable. Having development branches rebase relatively often leads to a much cleaner final git history that using multiple merges. For the first couple rebases of your development branch, you might want to tell people just before you do it by sending email out to dev@hive.

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-17925) Fix TestHooks so that it avoids ClassNotFound on teardown

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-17925: Summary: Fix TestHooks so that it avoids ClassNotFound on teardown Key: HIVE-17925 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17925 Project: Hive

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-17924) Restore SerDe by reverting HIVE-15167 to unbreak API compatibility

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-17924: Summary: Restore SerDe by reverting HIVE-15167 to unbreak API compatibility Key: HIVE-17924 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17924 Project:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.3.1 Release Candidate 0

Ok, in terms of storage-api, you are missing: commit dfcdf864db1351a35a7f8618eb67523feb9664e9 Author: sergey Date: Mon Jun 19 13:11:51 2017 -0700 HIVE-16864 : add validation to stream position search in LLAP IO (Sergey Shelukhin, reviewed by Prasanth Jayachandran) It has been committed o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.3.1 Release Candidate 0

Ok, in terms of storage-api, you are missing: commit dfcdf864db1351a35a7f8618eb67523feb9664e9 Author: sergey Date: Mon Jun 19 13:11:51 2017 -0700 HIVE-16864 : add validation to stream position search in LLAP IO (Sergey Shelukhin, reviewed by Prasanth Jayachandran) It has been committed o

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-17173) Add some connivence redirects to the Hive site

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-17173: Summary: Add some connivence redirects to the Hive site Key: HIVE-17173 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17173 Project: Hive Issue

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-17171) Remove old javadoc versions

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-17171: Summary: Remove old javadoc versions Key: HIVE-17171 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17171 Project: Hive Issue Type: Improv

Re: [VOTE] Shall we release Hive 2.2.0 rc1?

es wrote: > > > +1, checked the signatures, did a build with a clean repo, ran RAT. > > > > Alan. > > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Owen O'Malley > > wrote: > > > > > Ok, I rolled a new RC with the Apache header problem fixe

[VOTE] Shall we release Hive 2.2.0 rc1?

Ok, I rolled a new RC with the Apache header problem fixed. Artifacts: https://home.apache.org/~omalley/hive-2.2.0/ Tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/release-2.2.0rc1 da840b0 .. Owen

Re: [VOTE] Shall we release Hive 2.2.0 rc0?

Ok, Alan discovered that there are RAT failures, so I'll roll a new RC. Thanks, Owen On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, >The Hive branch-2.2 is passing its tests and I'd like to release it. > > Artifacts: https://home.apache.org

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-17154) fix rat problems in branch-2.2

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-17154: Summary: fix rat problems in branch-2.2 Key: HIVE-17154 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17154 Project: Hive Issue Type

[VOTE] Shall we release Hive 2.2.0 rc0?

All, The Hive branch-2.2 is passing its tests and I'd like to release it. Artifacts: https://home.apache.org/~omalley/hive-2.2.0/ Tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/release-2.2.0rc0 0068fcc I'm going through the list of issues on Jira today to make sure they match. Thanks, Ow

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-17118) Clean up of HIVE-14309 to move the orc source code to org.apache.hive.orc

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-17118: Summary: Clean up of HIVE-14309 to move the orc source code to org.apache.hive.orc Key: HIVE-17118 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17118 Pr

Re: [DISCUSS] Separating out the metastore as its own TLP

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Chao Sun wrote: > and maybe a different project name? > Yes, it certainly needs a new name. I'd like to suggest Riven. .. Owen

Re: [DISCUSS] Separating out the metastore as its own TLP

I'm +1 on separating out the metastore. It recognizes the reality that a lot of different projects use the Hive Metastore and opening up the community is a great move. ..Owen On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Xuefu Zhang wrote: > +1, sounds like a good idea! > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:24 PM,

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-16787) Fix itests in branch-2.2

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-16787: Summary: Fix itests in branch-2.2 Key: HIVE-16787 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16787 Project: Hive Issue Type: Bug Rep

Re: [VOTE] Should we release hive-storage-2.3.1rc0?

hanks > Prasanth > > > On May 26, 2017, at 11:26 AM, Eugene Koifman > wrote: > > > > Downloaded tarball, built and ran UTs > > +1 > > > > On 5/26/17, 9:43 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > > >All, > > There are a cou

[VOTE] Should we release hive-storage-2.3.1rc0?

All, There are a couple of fixes for hive-storage that we need in the 2.3 branch. Artifacts: tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/storage-release-2.3.1rc0 tar ball: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/hive-storage-2.3.1/ Thanks, Owen

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-16683) ORC WriterVersion gets ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException on newer ORC files

Owen O'Malley created HIVE-16683: Summary: ORC WriterVersion gets ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException on newer ORC files Key: HIVE-16683 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16683 Project:

Re: How to create a patch that contains a binary file

Try: % git format-patch --stdout HEAD^ > HIVE-1234.1.patch That will generate a git format patch that should preserve the binary file. .. Owen On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Juan Rodríguez Hortalá < juan.rodriguez.hort...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > For HIVE-16539 I created a patch that adds

Re: [VOTE] Should we release hive-storage-2.3.0rc0?

With three +1 votes and no -1's the vote passes. Thanks, Owen On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > +1. Did a build with a fresh maven repo, checked the signatures, ran rat. > > Alan. > > On Apr 27, 2017, 16:08 -0700, Owen O'Malley , wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Should we release hive-storage 2.4.0rc0?

017 at 11:39 AM, Pengcheng Xiong wrote: >> >> I downloaded the tarball, extracted, installed it. It works well with Hive >> 2.3 (candidate). Thus, +1 on this. Thanks a lot for your work! >> >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >>

[VOTE] Should we release hive-storage 2.4.0rc0?

All, Yes, I know this is confusing, but I wanted to help get the 2.4.0 storage-api released so that hive 2.3.0rc1 can depend on it. So, please check this release. Artifacts: tag: https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/storage-release-2.4.0rc0 branch: storage-branch-2.4 tar ball: http://hom

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >