Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Ayush Saxena
I feel that for some folks—especially those new to the project—seeing their name in the commit message might serve as a small motivation to review more. The practice of including the author name I believe has been around since the SVN days or the patch days, or even earlier, when committers used to

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Shohei Okumiya
+1 for the author part. Regarding the reviewers' names, I have one thouht from a bit diffrent angle. The number of reviewers is always the biggest bottleneck. If the small praize motivates people and they try one more review, it is meaningful. But I don't have any evidence about how many people fe

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Zsolt Miskolczi
+1. I don't see the value in that. Attila Turoczy ezt írta (időpont: 2025. ápr. 8., K, 16:32): > +1.It's a thoughtful gesture for reviewers, but if it creates headaches > for the dev's and adds unnecessary steps, I think we can live without it. > > -Attila > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 4:27 PM Sta

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Attila Turoczy
+1.It's a thoughtful gesture for reviewers, but if it creates headaches for the dev's and adds unnecessary steps, I think we can live without it. -Attila On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 4:27 PM Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > Hi all, > > How do you feel about dropping the contributor and reviewer names fro

[DISCUSS] Drop contributor/reviewer names from commit summary

2025-04-08 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Hi all, How do you feel about dropping the contributor and reviewer names from the commit summary? Before: HIVE-28884: Decouple source.q test from SRC dataset (Stamatis Zampetakis reviewed by Soumyakanti Das, Zsolt Miskolczi, Shohei Okumiya, Simhadri Govindappa) After: HIVE-28884: Decouple sour

Re: Move to JDK-11

2025-04-08 Thread Butao Zhang
The upgrade to JDK 17 is a significant change that introduces compatibility and adaptation requirements for both Apache Tez and Apache Hive. Relevant work is currently in progress—thanks to all community contributors who have already been involved in adaptation and fixes. We encourage everyone t

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing Default Table Format to Iceberg in Upcoming Releases

2025-04-08 Thread Butao Zhang
I'm definitely +1 on this proposal. Apache Hive has deeply integrated the Iceberg table format for several years now. Switching the default table format to Iceberg would send a strong and positive signal to the community: that Iceberg has become a first-class citizen in the Hive engine, and it'

[REVIEW] (HIVE-28884) Decouple source.q test from SRC dataset

2025-04-08 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
The PR has two reviews but lacks a binding +1. Can a commiter take a look: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/5750 Best, Stamatis