+1
-Ayush
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 at 00:21, Aman Sinha wrote:
>
> I think you meant HIVE-28666 (not HIVE-28166).
>
> Makes total sense to me to move to a normal (and modern) git controlled
> process for the docs, although the migration could take some time.
> +1
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 8:08 AM
I think you meant HIVE-28666 (not HIVE-28166).
Makes total sense to me to move to a normal (and modern) git controlled
process for the docs, although the migration could take some time.
+1
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 8:08 AM Simhadri G wrote:
> I fully support improving the Hive documentation, as i
Oh, I think I see. The upgrade to Hive 4 is just for the Hive metastore
support? When I read the thread, I thought that we weren't going to change
the metastore. That seems reasonable to me. Sorry for the confusion.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:24 AM rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sorry, I must have mi
Sorry, I must have missed something. I don't think that we should upgrade
anything in Iceberg to Hive 4. Why not simply remove the Hive support
entirely? Why would anyone need Hive 4 support from Iceberg when it is
built into Hive 4?
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 11:03 AM Daniel Weeks wrote:
> Hey Man
I fully support improving the Hive documentation, as it's long overdue.
Moving the docs to the Hive website is a great step, making it easier for
contributors to update and maintain them.
Additionally, we can incrementally enhance the Hive website by introducing
a search feature to help users navi
Hi all,
The discussion has started in some parallel threads but for
traceability and discovery purposes I thought that it would be better
to start a dedicated thread to be sure that it won't be missed by
anyone.
All the context and motivation is under HIVE-28166, so I will not
repeat those here.
