+1 (Binding)
+1 for EoL of Hive 3 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Simhadri G
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 9:41 PM Ayush Saxena wrote:
> Hi All,
> Following several discussions, this is the formal thread to mark the
> Hive 3.x release line as End of Life (EOL).
>
> Marking a release line as EOL means there will be no furth
Hi Everyone,
The voting for Hive 4.0.1 has ended, and we have received a total of 8 votes,
with 4 binding and 4 non-binding.
Binding:
Denys Kuzmenko
Ayush Saxena
Krisztian Kasa
Stamatis Zampetakis
Non-binding:
Simhadri G
Butao Zhang
Shohei Okumiya (Okumin)
Dmitriy Fingerman (difin)
Marking the 3.x release line EOL has no impact on existing users; they
are free to continue using it as they have for the past two years.
This decision is primarily about development focus—we’re officially
acknowledging that we won’t be dedicating efforts to 3.x anymore,
which has already been the
Hi All,
Following several discussions, this is the formal thread to mark the
Hive 3.x release line as End of Life (EOL).
Marking a release line as EOL means there will be no further releases
for this version. However, it does not affect any existing users who
can continue using it as they have bee
Since there is no legal issue with the .iml files I am changing by
vote to +1 (binding).
Best,
Stamatis
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 10:41 AM Denys Kuzmenko wrote:
>
> Since the licensing concerns were addressed I would propose to return to the
> original thread. I don't think it's worth the effort t
The -1 on releases is not a veto [1]. It's up to the release manager
to take the final decision to proceed with release or not. The thread
has already 3 +1 (binding) votes so my -1 has an advisory tone.
The files that are present in the release sources are not contributed
explicitly to the project
Hi Stamatis,
I have an answer here [1], I was checking some archives with similar
issues, [2] has similar stuff & so does a couple of more.
-Ayush
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-683?focusedCommentId=17886047&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#c
Hi everyone,
As we have confirmed that the "impl" file in release sources couldn't be the
licensing concerns, I've reverted the release sources back to its first
version, so the (non-)binding votes are still valid.
Again thanks to everyone for the verification and tests!
Best Regards,
Zhihu
Since the licensing concerns were addressed I would propose to return to the
original thread. I don't think it's worth the effort to create and validate a
new RC.
WDYT?
My take on this is that we do not need a new RC since the code hasn't changed,
`impl` files were removed just from packaged sources.
Maybe we could start a new vote, but there is no need for a new RC. We don't
need to repeat tests on binaries, just build from sources and do the checks.
And by
11 matches
Mail list logo
