Re: [DISCUSS] Nightly snaphot builds

Thanks Zoltan. Makes sense. Also, we should definitely strive to release within 180 days especially when there are lots of commits to a branch. -Vihang On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:04 AM Zoltan Haindrich wrote: > On 5/25/23 19:58, vihang karajgaonkar wrote: > > I just tried the job and it worked

Re: Question on hive.merge.nway.joins,

Hi Okumin, I agree that setting hive.merge.nway.joins to true (or false) can have both positive and negative effects on the performance, depending on the query and other related configuration parameters. I thought the default value was set to false for some correctness issue (for example, mapjoin_

Re: Question on hive.merge.nway.joins,

Hi Sungwoo, I have totally no idea why we changed the default value. I'm just sharing my knowledge and experience. First, I know there is a known issue when we use it with Tez. We can see the following statement on the official website

Re: [DISCUSS] Nightly snaphot builds

On 5/25/23 19:58, vihang karajgaonkar wrote: I just tried the job and it worked as expected. Thanks! If I understand correctly, the job retains builds for 180 days. Does it mean if there were no commits to a branch for more than 180 days, we will lose the build artifacts eventually? not entirel