Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.2-rc0?

> The release -1 votes aren't vetos. You just need more +1's than -1's. Thanks, I had not checked the bylaws and remembered this incorrectly :( -Jesús On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 1:42 PM Owen O'Malley wrote: > Sorry Jesus for not getting back to you sooner. I started diving into > ORC-577, but did

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.3.7 Release Candidate 0

Thank you so much Alan for doing this. 2020년 4월 8일 (수) 오전 9:26, Alan Gates 님이 작성: > Apache Hive 2.3.7 Release Candidate 0 is available here: > https://people.apache.org/~gates/apache-hive-2.3.7-rc0/ > > Maven artifacts are available here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgap

Re: [DISCUSS] I propose a Hive 2.3.7 release

Thank you, Alan. +1! 2020년 4월 8일 (수) 오전 3:41, Alan Gates 님이 작성: > I've seen no replies on this, so I'll assume people are ok with me going > ahead with the release. > > Alan. > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:20 PM Alan Gates wrote: > > > Hope everyone is well. > > > > There have been several reques

[VOTE] Apache Hive 2.3.7 Release Candidate 0

Apache Hive 2.3.7 Release Candidate 0 is available here: https://people.apache.org/~gates/apache-hive-2.3.7-rc0/ Maven artifacts are available here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-1100/ The tag release-2.3.7-rc0 has been applied to the source for this release in

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-23153) deregister from zookeeper is not properly worked on kerberized environment

Eugene Chung created HIVE-23153: --- Summary: deregister from zookeeper is not properly worked on kerberized environment Key: HIVE-23153 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23153 Project: Hive

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.2-rc0?

Sorry Jesus for not getting back to you sooner. I started diving into ORC-577, but didn't finish. The release -1 votes aren't vetos. You just need more +1's than -1's. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Bylaws#Bylaws-Voting That said, I'd ask for a different approach. Maybe we could

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-23152) Support CachedStore with get_partitions_with_specs

Vineet Garg created HIVE-23152: -- Summary: Support CachedStore with get_partitions_with_specs Key: HIVE-23152 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23152 Project: Hive Issue Type: Sub-t

Re: HIVE-21508 and Hive 2.3.7 question

Cool. Thanks for the consideration. On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:41 PM Alan Gates wrote: > I agree with Adrian that HIVE-21469 is beyond the scope of 2.3.7 for now. > If you want to backport it to the 2 branch I think it makes sense to put it > there in anticipation of a 2.4 release. > > Alan. > >

Re: HIVE-21508 and Hive 2.3.7 question

I agree with Adrian that HIVE-21469 is beyond the scope of 2.3.7 for now. If you want to backport it to the 2 branch I think it makes sense to put it there in anticipation of a 2.4 release. Alan. On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:40 AM Mass Dosage wrote: > I think, given that we're so close to potential

Re: [DISCUSS] I propose a Hive 2.3.7 release

I've seen no replies on this, so I'll assume people are ok with me going ahead with the release. Alan. On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:20 PM Alan Gates wrote: > Hope everyone is well. > > There have been several requests on the Hive mailing list for a 2.3.7 > release[1] I've been working with Adrian

[jira] [Created] (HIVE-23151) LLAP: default hive.llap.file.cleanup.delay.seconds=0s

László Bodor created HIVE-23151: --- Summary: LLAP: default hive.llap.file.cleanup.delay.seconds=0s Key: HIVE-23151 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23151 Project: Hive Issue Type:

Re: Review Request 72324: HIVE-22750: Consolidate LockType naming

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72324/#review220239 --- LGTM, some comments hcatalog/streaming/src/java/org/apache/hive/

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.7.2-rc0?

@Owen, will you be able to provide feedback on HIVE-22959 / ORC-577 shortly? The -1 constitutes a veto to the release, but it has been a week since we received that vote and we are still awaiting feedback. Currently the storage-api release and rest of Panos contribution are on hold because of this.