Hi Oleg,
I don't know but I do know MD5 is obsolete for our purposes.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, 5:53 AM Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 05:47 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > But why are you looking at md5sum? It is beyond obsolete. We should
> > be considering what 'shasum -a
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 05:47 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
> But why are you looking at md5sum? It is beyond obsolete. We should
> be considering what 'shasum -a 512' does IMO.
>
md5sum / shasum are interface compatible, are they not?
Oleg
--
But why are you looking at md5sum? It is beyond obsolete. We should be
considering what 'shasum -a 512' does IMO.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, 4:57 AM Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 13:40 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Yes but https://ss64.com/mac/shasum.html
> >
> > Says the fo
On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 13:40 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Yes but https://ss64.com/mac/shasum.html
>
> Says the format is SUM SPACE CHAR FILE
>
> where CHAR is one of '*', '?', or ' ' depending on the file type.
>
This is not how I read it and it is hot how it is explained here [1].
The script a
