Personally, I don't think that having the "fin" keyword alternative
would be good. I think it would discourage usage, as examples get split
between "fin" and "final", and people don't already know what "fin" means.
Cheers,
11011011
On 07/21/2018 11:50 AM, MG wrote:
Hi guys,
I have been wond
On 2020-05-07 13:43 , Daniel.Sun wrote:
```
// https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9522
def a() { null }
def b() { '' }
a()?[b(), a()].join(','):b() // statement with ambiguities
```
The above statement with ambiguities can be parsed into:
1) safe indexing expression, `a()?[[b(), a()
One thing to consider is the EOL schedule, of course. Oracle
advertises[1] "extended support" for its Java customers for:
JDK version
until
8
2030*
11
2026
17
2029
* "The Extended Support uplift fee will be waived for the period March
2022 - December 2030 for
I understand that this refers to the java.time.Duration that was
introduced in JDK 8. However, Groovy already had the
groovy.time.Duration, so including the package name might help avoid
some confusion.
On 2023-06-07 07:41 , Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
Hi,
In my Spock tests, to check some as
